[ietf-nomcom] Does errata processing result in XML patches? (was: Re: Help with three errata against RFC8713)

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Mon, 07 August 2023 08:23 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF8AC151551 for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 01:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GlQHULdZmL7w for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 01:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400::25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD8BC151554 for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 01:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 3C8D6807D0; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 11:23:35 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1691396628; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=s+KynsDezcscf2kmuoRXbK9s3R23sywv6kJ/Peq1qag=; b=aRYMK0MmGHsB/Li7kQzY+zQ5K74xkANXxqIFfj5zRRin8KXBiGTLh3CjQGeBVuDPrGcX5b hbd2IwYRDUCC/46jk7WEX5w4CHye1KwC1+b07woZMujzEMIpZaNLP39+DRFw3sSAUhbI4N zMFrh1w2nR9S3yuyBmZwfaJsgW7gJdigqpcWM+eBSDTTMnBXfCJMtgbDBz9qjHsjwQ8FxV JpnCr4cG4N3UW3nIPbPbZoqQl1tXtrm1uAQiaDNUOVbZZpeH1CGLKfzYvE7e6+0+5WF677 yGAn8jdBxKpc6Hvya1ElanTIHkufnmoYS2FwJzv5yY6ezL5CD3j+XgC0HkCwFA==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FD3D8A83-2B27-4DC4-A69D-2B2A49680C3B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <15304.1691258451@localhost>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 11:23:34 +0300
Cc: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <59150235-8092-4629-B143-475087A12962@eggert.org>
References: <C8B9E859-A7EA-4419-B9EB-28FD0E7774B5@eggert.org> <17378.1691160210@localhost> <7883046C-303F-43FC-B5D0-F7CD1CBF9041@eggert.org> <15304.1691258451@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-nomcom/Ujbql6Hx1NBWsckHaPnUTbzW9sA>
Subject: [ietf-nomcom] Does errata processing result in XML patches? (was: Re: Help with three errata against RFC8713)
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process <ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-nomcom/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 08:23:59 -0000

Hi,

On Aug 5, 2023, at 21:00, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> Does HFDU result in XML patches?

I don't know. Adding rfc-interest@, maybe someone there knows.

Thanks,
Lars