IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp

Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Tue, 25 October 2011 17:14 UTC

Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9PHE3UR069631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:14:03 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.13.5/Submit) id p9PHE3Ur069630; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:14:03 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9PHE28j069624 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:14:02 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from presnick@qualcomm.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=presnick@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1319562842; x=1351098842; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originating-ip; z=Message-ID:=20<4EA6EE1A.5010804@qualcomm.com>|Date:=20Tu e,=2025=20Oct=202011=2012:12:58=20-0500|From:=20Pete=20Re snick=20<presnick@qualcomm.com>|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0 =20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B =20en-US=3B=20rv:1.9.1.9)=20Gecko/20100630=20Eudora/3.0.4 |MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20"Murray=20S.=20Kucherawy"=20<m sk@cloudmark.com>|CC:=20"ietf-smtp@imc.org"=20<ietf-smtp@ imc.org>|Subject:=20Re:=20draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp |References:=20<F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14BF C@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<F5833273385 BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14BFC@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.co m>|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"ISO-8859-1" =3B=20format=3Dflowed|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |X-Originating-IP:=20[172.30.48.1]; bh=gbU3/FQ5IeoZ26ck2SVSfw15kupvDk2hbYbsP0Qyww4=; b=RyXykc4IxV/XNJk3H7P0ud33M0138wF1I2MXJzodMW8zBI8AvMUqLdPP YH5P7iiPG5xCeIGfmz31gp3sa3RraQT4Zgkj8HD29xTvG0UjXsw7Og8r9 pI2zp1gYyF2EsFebnlSwF20Pq7EBf7AWOzMCpW0Avr3e9hgpW4G0wkmY9 0=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6509"; a="130634637"
Received: from ironmsg03-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.17]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 25 Oct 2011 10:14:01 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,404,1315206000"; d="scan'208";a="148598467"
Received: from nasanexhc05.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.2]) by Ironmsg03-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 25 Oct 2011 10:14:01 -0700
Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.339.1; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:13:00 -0700
Message-ID: <4EA6EE1A.5010804@qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:12:58 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
CC: "ietf-smtp@imc.org" <ietf-smtp@imc.org>
Subject: Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14BFC@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14BFC@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1]
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

(a) This shouldn't be labeled as a BCP. It's an A/S Standards Track 
draft if ever there was one.
(b) Given this and the extension, is it worth spinning up a Greylisting WG?

pr

On 10/23/11 3:40 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Maybe a new thread Subject: would help here...
>
> Given the interest, I've started putting together a BCP.  It's now posted as draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp; comments welcome (and thanks to those of you that already did).  It is only an outline right now, and I'll fill it in as people make suggestions about topics it should cover and/or start providing text to include.
>
> It doesn't touch the SMTP extension people are discussing.  Someone else can champion that one if so inclined.  That shouldn't go in a BCP because it doesn't even exist yet.  This document will only describe current and historic practices.
>
> Maybe we can get it on the docket for Taipei.  I'll send out some friendly pings.
>
> -MSK
>
>
>    

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email