IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 27 October 2011 04:55 UTC

Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9R4t1oN091694 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:55:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.13.5/Submit) id p9R4t1Ni091693; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:55:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9R4t08M091673 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:55:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from dhc@dcrocker.net)
Received: from [10.115.193.68] ([62.50.248.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9R4spLb012200 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:54:59 -0700
Message-ID: <4EA8E417.9070904@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:54:47 +0200
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
CC: "ietf-smtp@imc.org" <ietf-smtp@imc.org>
Subject: Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14BFC@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4EA6EE1A.5010804@qualcomm.com> <4EA7C3AF.1070402@dcrocker.net> <2188C106-043B-4A59-A09C-D88E7B17C307@network-heretics.com> <4EA8226D.80303@qualcomm.com> <4EA824AE.1060404@dcrocker.net> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14CFB@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14CFB@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

On 10/27/2011 6:38 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> Greylisting is not a protocol, according to any definition I know.
>
> ...as currently defined.  It seems this fledgling effort seeks to change
> that, and would introduce a new part of SMTP that could be so tested.


Please note the subject line of this thread.  The SMTP extension is not the 
document being discussed.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email