IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 26 October 2011 08:24 UTC

Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9Q8OZgm047365 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Oct 2011 01:24:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.13.5/Submit) id p9Q8OZuZ047364; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 01:24:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9Q8OYJG047359 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 01:24:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from dhc@dcrocker.net)
Received: from [10.101.2.93] (62-50-200-162.client.stsn.net [62.50.200.162]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9Q8OMLs018695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Oct 2011 01:24:31 -0700
Message-ID: <4EA7C3AF.1070402@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:24:15 +0200
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
CC: "ietf-smtp@imc.org" <ietf-smtp@imc.org>
Subject: Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14BFC@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4EA6EE1A.5010804@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EA6EE1A.5010804@qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 26 Oct 2011 01:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

Pete,

I don't understand, either.  While it lists a /set/ of alternative or 
complementary best practices, it /is/ about best practices.  Please explain.

d/

On 10/25/2011 7:12 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>
> (a) This shouldn't be labeled as a BCP. It's an A/S Standards Track draft if
> ever there was one.
> (b) Given this and the extension, is it worth spinning up a Greylisting WG?
>
> pr
>
> On 10/23/11 3:40 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> Maybe a new thread Subject: would help here...
>>
>> Given the interest, I've started putting together a BCP. It's now posted as
>> draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp; comments welcome (and thanks to those of you
>> that already did). It is only an outline right now, and I'll fill it in as
>> people make suggestions about topics it should cover and/or start providing
>> text to include.
>>
>> It doesn't touch the SMTP extension people are discussing. Someone else can
>> champion that one if so inclined. That shouldn't go in a BCP because it
>> doesn't even exist yet. This document will only describe current and historic
>> practices.
>>
>> Maybe we can get it on the docket for Taipei. I'll send out some friendly pings.
>>
>> -MSK
>>
>>
>

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email