Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ?
"Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> Mon, 07 October 2019 17:30 UTC
Return-Path: <valdis@vt.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7531208F5 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <acGe7cRSInbw>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Non-encoded 8-bit data (char D0 hex): Cc: \320\224\320\270\320\273\321\217\320\275 \320\237\320\260\320[...]
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id acGe7cRSInbw for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omr2.cc.vt.edu (omr2.cc.ipv6.vt.edu [IPv6:2607:b400:92:8400:0:33:fb76:806e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 171BB1208DC for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mr3.cc.vt.edu (mr3.cc.vt.edu [IPv6:2607:b400:92:8500:0:7f:b804:6b0a]) by omr2.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x97HUcDO023287 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 13:30:39 -0400
Received: from mail-qk1-f199.google.com (mail-qk1-f199.google.com [209.85.222.199]) by mr3.cc.vt.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x97HUXhe011735 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 13:30:38 -0400
Received: by mail-qk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id w7so15613735qkf.10 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 10:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:date:message-id; bh=kNCUkWayAuzeCd6mdesBmFdGQ3ZQGTIHcckOL34tZsw=; b=otjs5sJl+Ebzc1QW4K1x8LksYPEw/3cnwAILW/lldndzOeneh/F0LspB8/b3LPLS3+ 7cdLcpJMXc69ysMwNzzNxECeiiroshvmaL7LzAbUTAmW3BBDj2vtfS3iCiKaRxzVwQ6O 59ISuEFs+luJKmQOBip8lwIwzgOeYhvxUmAC/9gUg8YIwzqBeDtQ/hUT13lcdLJAoV69 USxrAlY3tRQvsTm7fveju/7BSDrEKvNF9/tNLqzHiCAEnkYlEotncGF09hGFmEJP5a8A 2jYFii8CqWvGnrkTW0mOBJlMmXpw0O1Vk8/msIpwIY5942x9/MvYuRiN5rf1wsS0tQk5 xQvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUijq3ClBfhO4XYt8hHikT3LK3qUdgvj5b3pwIOLrekp2oDoM63 djcB+/BZTN1GVXuV/MbrYBkXfahtPXiunAj3XHNkl0JnmM7QFVV2H0USpF5Yg2gdjko6NCGBDZb 9NRjTULMOZ+CjcaTyvqinng==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7a8d:: with SMTP id x13mr30943811qtr.155.1570469433085; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 10:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyMkp/FMgW60hHb4j9iX83TzMYpZgbK8qt8tip0jVe7LIXXRzr00LDPcBb5sFFe2CvSMxKrPQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7a8d:: with SMTP id x13mr30943769qtr.155.1570469432699; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 10:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from turing-police ([2601:5c0:c001:4341::9ca]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id x12sm10623844qtb.32.2019.10.07.10.30.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Oct 2019 10:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis@vt.edu>
From: Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>
X-Google-Original-From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.7+dev
To: Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan <giri@dombox.org>
Cc: Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>, SMTP Discuss <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOEezJRXUZkPoJn_kV92q=OQoUs32VzTR5a0JeAKg6NYBW55=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20191007002348.GA23742@x2.esmtp.org> <20191007015616.BE113BB3D68@ary.qy> <CANtKdUeC0NVfvVpbHtwd=OoO=BoT8KNWVx8BGF-GPZPU-zo6QA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOEezJTH4Jukz2J4jSDfixECg2Jyyk4+cDnasiAoa4Q2F9=ZZw@mail.gmail.com> <b0dae4ca6e95dc83ca70f71ad780a1432273bcf5.camel@aegee.org> <CAOEezJRXUZkPoJn_kV92q=OQoUs32VzTR5a0JeAKg6NYBW55=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1570469430_19279P"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 13:30:30 -0400
Message-ID: <19705.1570469430@turing-police>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/OD5dqrj2FBuexQQD-OLnUZQAMtA>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ?
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 17:30:52 -0000
On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 22:55:19 +0530, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan said: > We both use a different demographic to define "end user" for MTA-STS. The > way you see it, an end user is a "mail server operator". The way I see it, > an end user is a "small business" who hosts their mails in a third party > mail service like Gmail. Configuring an HTTPS server is not going to be > easy for such small businesses. The obvious answer is, of course, to write the proposal such that the https server can be outsourced the same way the email service was outsourced, and the DNS service was outsourced to a DNS hosting company. There's an obvious business opportunity for hosting the email, the DNS, the http, and any other bits as one turnkey package.
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Claus Assmann
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Daniel Margolis
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Дилян Палаузов
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Stan Kalisch
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Daniel Margolis
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Tony Finch
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Tony Finch
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
- Re: [ietf-smtp] MTA-STS scale (was: why are we re… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ? John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Tony Finch
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Tony Finch
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Mark Andrews
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Hector Santos
- [ietf-smtp] HTTPS degrading (was: [OT] (signed TL… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs) Tony Finch
- Re: [ietf-smtp] HTTPS degrading Hector Santos