IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs)

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Fri, 11 October 2019 04:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B653120048 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 21:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14iarQnplGm4 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 21:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04D6D120024 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 21:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (unknown [192.168.1.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1327D2B5CC5 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:32:51 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <20191010203605.3AD8BC94A22@ary.qy>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:32:47 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Message-Id: <37864F03-56E5-4611-BDD8-567730756149@dukhovni.org>
References: <20191010203605.3AD8BC94A22@ary.qy>
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/rIVXjJ7lyM9ntnZ7Gs5HxmBkCVA>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs)
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 04:32:55 -0000

> On Oct 10, 2019, at 4:36 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
> Oh, whoops, thay said, and sp.am is now signed.  But with this much
> effort, no wonder most other 2LDs in .am are not.

Yes, one of they key barriers to DNSSEC adoption is lack of a uniform
interface between registrant and registrar for creation and maintenance
of DS RRsets.

CDS support at registries is essential to removing this roadblock to DNSSEC
adoption, by getting the registrar out of the critical path.

-- 
	Viktor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email