Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs)

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 11 October 2019 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D91120018 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=tokP76bK; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=s6Fv9Fwc
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CSAxLqHP03JL for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 032F5120013 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 2764 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2019 16:08:03 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=aca.5da0a8e3.k1910; i=printer-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=L3U07aIDMEG7qFBNJYoq2ziPcVL2JyZDZJ5TrA+vSgs=; b=tokP76bKiGotQAOsnvub0Wc2NS1I0sgrs4kuIAGwuEhZpxTpm1A/vjB/rGtjMCvO7/YEsEUS98SimFcerYvtB8gkGL1Wf3XXjHfNN0jUwHz9pUZ488geq5Ym264D7E3ar532OzBf1ZsCvL/0/jmehCGqPo29QYq5ZfKvXYNj8kEGv+phpYMgw6Xz2RrQ7ZSxhTDUkqAoVihtwpCROaXuTTERiiGG3Joexj1QqlB7EAK5NOA80tCAhg4ufPYYeaPm
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=aca.5da0a8e3.k1910; olt=printer-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=L3U07aIDMEG7qFBNJYoq2ziPcVL2JyZDZJ5TrA+vSgs=; b=s6Fv9FwcfTWBHp8sFJZnluyB2Lc8iVIb/arAxVEqudrGN6ls4uot8DoeD/kLFPyMZXzPWUd/G+O11WlogPfN/KkpSZZEptfcGvkh2fteg03/rh5OMpQz1CNY/rmIa7yph6402t51hX6xrc9PgH0Fadz384XiAmQ/02B08ikic5gUBSCbGwSNFo9r1FXfp8soNsjCV1mp+PR4ZLLusOdN3EWj/KcGiUVVttww3NmjxHPCSE/lyrfG7I1vMcqWsic8
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, printer@iecc.com) via TCP6; 11 Oct 2019 16:08:02 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 50C81C9B780; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:08:01 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:08:01 -0400
Message-Id: <20191011160802.50C81C9B780@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <37864F03-56E5-4611-BDD8-567730756149@dukhovni.org>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/xhzAOjp-svYP9HTfkftiSp22G4U>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] [OT] (signed TLDs)
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:08:08 -0000

In article <37864F03-56E5-4611-BDD8-567730756149@dukhovni.org> you write:
>> On Oct 10, 2019, at 4:36 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Oh, whoops, thay said, and sp.am is now signed.  But with this much
>> effort, no wonder most other 2LDs in .am are not.
>
>Yes, one of they key barriers to DNSSEC adoption is lack of a uniform
>interface between registrant and registrar for creation and maintenance
>of DS RRsets.

Not just registrant, but DNS operator.  As I may have said once or
twice, I have about 100 zones where I run the DNS for someone else,
and I am not going to pretend to be my registrants to install the DS
records.

>CDS support at registries is essential to removing this roadblock to DNSSEC
>adoption, by getting the registrar out of the critical path.

Unless I missed something, CDS currently only lets you update DS records,
not install them initially.

R's,
John