Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period

I also agree - just some editorial suggestions. As the reader may not be
completely familiar with the RFC series or RFC Editor role, an early
reference to rfc-editor.org would be helpful. In addition, all document
references, especially RFC references, should be hyperlinks.

Cheers,
Andy

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 9:47 AM Lucy Lynch <llynch@civil-tongue.net> wrote:

>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Sep 9, 2019, at 7:11 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > With that fix, Mike's draft looks pretty good to me.
> >
>
> I agree - this is much closer to what I’d expect to see if I was looking
> at this job as a potential candidate
>
>
> > Regards
> >   Brian
> >
> >> On 09-Sep-19 06:57, Michael StJohns wrote:
> >>> On 9/8/2019 2:25 PM, RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel) wrote:
> >>> Hi Mike,
> >>>
> >>> With my ISE hat on...
> >>>
> >>>> I also added an "optional deliverable" to cover April fool's RFCs.
> >>> While the ISE in some sense sits under the RSE, I believe that the 4/1
> >>> RFCs are the responsibility of the ISE, not the RSE.
> >>>
> >>> Operationally, the ISE has always asked the for an opinion on candidate
> >>> documents, but the final decision has been with the ISE.
> >>>
> >>> I don't think you need to include this in the SoW.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Adrian
> >>
> >> OOPS!   Noted and easy enough to remove.
> >>
> >> Let's see where/if this goes first...
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rfc-interest mailing list
> >> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rfc-interest mailing list
> > rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>