IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 10 September 2019 02:11 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E389C1200C3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5x0HL9Av-E5R for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72BA2120059 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id u72so8926151pgb.10 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 19:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nnpfz6a1fgz3/KeY/sPMcfTLc6mWVts0gUYTa96MdQQ=; b=JagOeCE5iDhyeLoHUwfOoWUhERMbJGCTfMBPgNYwkVi0o/a8r5CLZROey3KG2lQSPC EQ7dz6G+o0LsBuzsl/laFYs7cTNtP4nCs8FfbLFx1OXfxGkPofy5vczjvnvJYXIbHJPn utLoKFUKP9BkK0/th75MW7cum/r7C9Q/vTCZCFBMGQQAJMkkBUfFyG1Rokz7YafziAMj ZGR3mzuXcjtS0MDYUS0qFQazQ4SNshjzvgiw42N511BvxF+JtMVTDcSKds1/8SojkQHp 361IlfzCzg0baznIYUfMMsWwuUOHbN7R/QVaWEvq7Hn6HyFGgnq+eqRDmxJW7Fp1SdEb RFmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nnpfz6a1fgz3/KeY/sPMcfTLc6mWVts0gUYTa96MdQQ=; b=B7gX/EpuXKC4zFXOlg/1dTTq5REotUWj92RBBgqPnRqbZsmKiXN3+wYpTIaa3qYfa8 Bs5hQL4EhPXXNKWBAzyDt00q0anhrH1wJfenemiJBP8r7yQ9gV9Gnkd8ZVd6tGCL+ISr L3gVDC/YOpAYF1fuzj1acdug1JnguoyZ3LUshMTvd5SkkZRCRvIcqhVlFjV+zAXCkXqr tZ0ABRyFVNAA0A2zsY0zGtjDOh5Z9Zk9DmnGr3u9WZT0Ps6+htFNrZmSal4Hkqu5v4gr JjQaPINjXBjml6Jy+Fghx+vh8i6j1sJYLcKwHW+dUskwxmcQGkH+mUMqeasCMRcSjC0K lMWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXQDJzf3akixG2rB7RX2whaC1U0+zY8cRFB7v+DTdLxiU8gmW+d K4xtrtdWkOC7AjvfHUJg/8K9ZDR5
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwi8eFwa5g4mdhf3SVeYAjH0jSEPKJZ9dGEhCtWBPiy7k2HrWqhwX9PQeaqzVIWxDN8kS1baw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:c05:: with SMTP id b5mr424047pgl.415.1568081503555; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 19:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (82.206.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.206.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u2sm4651330pgp.66.2019.09.09.19.11.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Sep 2019 19:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period
To: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, IETF Discuss List <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <ec715385-93ca-ddf0-f9b1-d0e4ae1666fe@nthpermutation.com> <f3edd70c403583ab560888be39001d14.squirrel@www.amsl.com> <09bb6e35-bafa-90d9-fe35-e2feb21e6564@nthpermutation.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <85f156b5-ad48-520d-a416-6c838b6d6174@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:11:38 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <09bb6e35-bafa-90d9-fe35-e2feb21e6564@nthpermutation.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/tKjxD3saFzReYdrw6E4v9ExY2F4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 02:11:46 -0000

With that fix, Mike's draft looks pretty good to me.

Regards
   Brian

On 09-Sep-19 06:57, Michael StJohns wrote:
> On 9/8/2019 2:25 PM, RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel) wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> With my ISE hat on...
>>
>>> I also added an "optional deliverable" to cover April fool's RFCs.
>> While the ISE in some sense sits under the RSE, I believe that the 4/1
>> RFCs are the responsibility of the ISE, not the RSE.
>>
>> Operationally, the ISE has always asked the for an opinion on candidate
>> documents, but the final decision has been with the ISE.
>>
>> I don't think you need to include this in the SoW.
>>
>> Best,
>> Adrian
> 
> OOPS!   Noted and easy enough to remove.
> 
> Let's see where/if this goes first...
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email