Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period

Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> Sun, 08 September 2019 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <msj@nthpermutation.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8373B120088 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 08:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VodtT0mVuc75 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 08:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 944B6120059 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 08:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id b2so13112507qtq.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 08:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language; bh=pd+aSs4gk59nLd8ZZd+BEqg5GaaGxp9nkDCC1KKa1Q0=; b=NV0l8Mbyw91EWnqpOuzH3Rst82l7GN7+WsxPdBiBb13BMKhQxXbf9DT4Ge34RrWYzP mgNeFE6r1ZttksD8e0PbYgecFznzemjcgGGh8ZI/rfinEpb6w8uG4K0ivTOw7vdrB6Km hSXb2y6JexFPgkkTWqFcZxUejEimAgpQHde/ULtI9Dab8jLR5Md3XHoOiIcNuTl58MoB NvLKQUX+/E7MnbdW80TuV3MEfug5AEtptc9JrawADSbn0pE3ZcH6lqzLRJ98euyY+lba J7KVjFYlmTB5qlwo700+u43MJtZ8e3jG+eQ2gv7cwAQEuwTsr7QP3FKNVJbJ2xTWQn3J nGRw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language; bh=pd+aSs4gk59nLd8ZZd+BEqg5GaaGxp9nkDCC1KKa1Q0=; b=tmfLSj1S+WB5yN/pTQiJq91XnuvaDmcqOUOlh9LT2kQWY0RYXppian/8l786UjUbw5 vQx5jiyvNW3Ak6gcdRwAo49vkAtM2FUWcvrUQtAe1Fe03KOD2bFMoU1tnVLg4Nzutkqm S4HStaNkGoXZQnbbA7D+ztK4qejjZtlyc3+UIiz3yM7Bx3gwHta4zGOnSQb6xa1JuPvs nI5Sfb6XyZnR0tBcarUSykVMt+F8M3DSVE/K4WS+7UqaA0YQvWxVaTQAxUil0cAEBxPH bJVm2iZhuMju89jxxnvJgFssksG/HmQG8mlM9YFtwzZN54ZnZ9afwfnryZjF8kjcEHft y1QA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUM7qdLzF6/2GYGKHuvcCtUU9rFr3U3oKHZPzS99n5RbJZCyZ11 aOskojRUwihZf8K1ZmLTGHYcbQmZfkE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxYtyh93DxVevafhH1AqSiRObI7aXU/EOgp8j+2XATJpYHe7wpd1YcNzmTdwq+fY3UG1Soj/Q==
X-Received: by 2002:aed:3f3a:: with SMTP id p55mr19893844qtf.148.1567957835149; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 08:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:152:4400:437c:cbe:e8ec:3551:21ad? ([2601:152:4400:437c:cbe:e8ec:3551:21ad]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z12sm5928356qkg.97.2019.09.08.08.50.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Sep 2019 08:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: IETF Discuss List <ietf@ietf.org>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
From: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Subject: Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period
Message-ID: <ec715385-93ca-ddf0-f9b1-d0e4ae1666fe@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 11:50:32 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------965829D7BE1294D12D7E1F6A"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/36b3nxcGb9N8Ey9fmto2OpqwW30>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 15:50:39 -0000

After thinking about it a bit, I decided I really didn't like the SOW as 
it mostly ignored the input the community had given in the discussion to 
the run up to the SOW.   So I wrote a new one.  This one mostly 
completely replaces the project summary with something a bit clearer for 
the bidders and I think more accurately describes the role of the PM as 
acting RSE.  The reporting relationship was changed to more accurately 
reflect the legal relationship between the bidder, the LLC and the RSOC 
and to constrain some of the issues we encountered in the last few months.

Much of the Education and experience section survived, albeit rearranged 
and word twiddled in places.

Ditto for the skills section.

The "Operational Oversight" section is replaced by "Typical 
Deliverables" and broken up into three sections as I suggested in an 
earlier email.

I also added an "optional deliverable" to cover April fool's RFCs.

This is basically an SOW for an RSE, but with the exclusion of planning 
for evolution of the series.  That was the only thing I could find as 
"strategic".

Discuss!

Mike