Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational

[Kireeti Kompella <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Bob Braden wrote:

> According to the IANA assignment rules for RSVP values, the only two
> options are IETF consensus and FCFS.

The document in question is the *CR-LDP* Extensions.  I am (sadly)
aware of the RSVP assignment status.

>   *> If code points are to be allocated from the space to be allocated by
>   *> IETF Consensus, I strongly suggest that a *Standards Track* document be
>   *> written, with more detail on the messages, especially their processing.
>
> Indeed, that is what "IETF consensus" means, isn't it?

Is it?  That's good.  Currently, the document is Informational, and
is being processed as such.  Can this be changed?

Kireeti.