RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone

"Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com> Sun, 16 February 2020 07:38 UTC

Return-Path: <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9420812002E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 23:38:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gQLhW0DM0L13 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 23:38:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55DDF120013 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 23:38:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 61BA59A10DD3D1974F24 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 07:38:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMM423-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.40) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 07:38:01 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM526-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.96]) by dggemm423-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 15:37:54 +0800
From: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
Thread-Topic: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
Thread-Index: AdXkmYmRsjKrv1C8QBSOI8vHxWHOIA==
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 07:37:54 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD27D91338@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.202.72]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2uBxg_5holyOTzKJOQ3M5sHI-K8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 07:38:10 -0000

One issue to consider about having  an entirely virtual meeting is what are the implication on participants in different time zone.
Attending  few scattered session may not be a big issue but if one wants to attend many sessions it becomes a problem.

My personal experience when trying to attend a QUIC WG Interim meeting in Japan was very bad.

1. The meeting time for me was from 2:00AM till 10:00 AM. (9:00-17:00 in Japan) for three days.
2. I used the lunch break to try to catch some sleep, due to lack of enough time to sleep
3. Starting at 2:00 AM did not provide enough time to have a healthy night sleep before starting my daily attendance.
4. The recovery from the "jetlag" was much slower than when attending the meeting in person.

My conclusion was that I will try to avoid as much as I can this mode of participating from remote in a meeting that takes a couple of days in which I have to attend multiple sessions.
It is not healthy.


One other advantage of a f2f meeting is the "official" and non-official off line sessions/meetings that I find very productive while attending the IETF meeting

If a full virtual meeting will happen and use Vancouver time zone than daily meeting from 9-18 will be 19-4AM for me


Roni Even


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Alston
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 8:48 AM
> To: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I am just wondering if there are any thoughts on the status of the IETF 107
> meeting in light of the corona virus.
> 
> Particularly in light of the fact that for safety reasons mobile world congress
> has been cancelled and we're seeing other events being cancelled in light of
> this as well.  Should it be considered a safe and responsible move to go
> ahead with this meeting or should we be looking at an entirely virtual
> meeting in light of the situation?
> 
> Andrew