RE: SDNAuth - Secure SDN authentication and authorization - Interested?

"Hosnieh Rafiee" <ietf@rozanak.com> Wed, 04 February 2015 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@rozanak.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2F71A1B4F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:29:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Vfot8KuZ3sS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.rozanak.com (mail.rozanak.com [IPv6:2a01:238:42ad:1500:aa19:4238:e48f:61cf]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69B481A1EEA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rozanak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838D225CA22E; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 19:29:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rozanak.com
Received: from mail.rozanak.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.iknowlaws.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kHXAF3nWSSQd; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:29:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from kopoli (p5B342E71.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.52.46.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rozanak.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A48D25CA21F; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:29:16 +0100 (CET)
From: Hosnieh Rafiee <ietf@rozanak.com>
To: 'Ted Lemon' <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
References: <012901d03692$cdc46630$694d3290$@rozanak.com> <CA+9kkMApUS=y0zNg7GDHGogU9tG=s=WwuEuy=OGdQAdCuYczOg@mail.gmail.com> <54D17283.7080708@gondrom.org> <EB9AAE7B-9756-4CB2-8CB2-CEB973306C82@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <EB9AAE7B-9756-4CB2-8CB2-CEB973306C82@nominum.com>
Subject: RE: SDNAuth - Secure SDN authentication and authorization - Interested?
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 20:29:15 +0100
Message-ID: <009001d040b0$dcfa0920$96ee1b60$@rozanak.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQISgK84RX9GRHtbq7+pSR0m8KMk+wI8fQcSATSI92oDFirU8ZwoJXcA
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3-uxkiUxbWzBSA0ycQMYFxADw10>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 19:29:23 -0000

Hi Ted,

> From: Ted Lemon [mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 2:12 PM
> 
> On Feb 3, 2015, at 6:14 PM, Tobias Gondrom
> <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> wrote:
> > just fyi: the mailing-list does on its sign-up page (in the first line)
make the
> explicit statement to operate under the IETF
> Notewell:https://mail.rozanak.com/mailman/listinfo/sdnauth
> 
> That's precisely what I would advise doing in this situation.   It might
be worth
> adding that the list is informal and is not sponsored by the IETF, though;
> otherwise people might get the impression that it's an official IETF
mailing list.
> You should also disclose whether or not the list is being archived,
although
> since it's not an IETF mailing list, whether you do so is not up to us.
If the list is
> not archived, however, it might be difficult and involve a painful
discovery
> process if for some reason the Note Well had to be enforced in a lawsuit.
So
> while keeping an archive places an additional burden on Hosnieh, it is
> probably a win for other participants.
> 
> (And yes, I realize you were talking to the other Ted... :)


The List archives all messages. The archives are public. I also sent the
Note Well to the members to aware of this fact because of privacy issue.
Members also received this Note Well when they joined the list.

This is what I could do as an admin of the list :-) I hope the procedure was
enough :-)


Thanks,
Best,
Hosnieh