IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: SDNAuth - Secure SDN authentication and authorization - Interested?

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 04 February 2015 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A511A877B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 05:12:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2XpPxP0rQCWX for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 05:12:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB8DB1A00E4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 05:12:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB7B0DA017E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:12:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-03.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDFF53E085; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 05:12:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.21.196.201] (64.110.2.19) by CAS-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (64.89.235.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 05:12:15 -0800
Subject: Re: SDNAuth - Secure SDN authentication and authorization - Interested?
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Priority: 4 (Low)
In-Reply-To: <54D17283.7080708@gondrom.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 06:12:10 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EB9AAE7B-9756-4CB2-8CB2-CEB973306C82@nominum.com>
References: <012901d03692$cdc46630$694d3290$@rozanak.com> <CA+9kkMApUS=y0zNg7GDHGogU9tG=s=WwuEuy=OGdQAdCuYczOg@mail.gmail.com> <54D17283.7080708@gondrom.org>
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [64.110.2.19]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/X17XPipy47aoMO-rM93WtFwhkcY>
Cc: ted.ietf@gmail.com, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 13:12:17 -0000

On Feb 3, 2015, at 6:14 PM, Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> wrote:
> just fyi: the mailing-list does on its sign-up page (in the first line) make the explicit statement to operate under the IETF Notewell:https://mail.rozanak.com/mailman/listinfo/sdnauth

That's precisely what I would advise doing in this situation.   It might be worth adding that the list is informal and is not sponsored by the IETF, though; otherwise people might get the impression that it's an official IETF mailing list.   You should also disclose whether or not the list is being archived, although since it's not an IETF mailing list, whether you do so is not up to us.   If the list is not archived, however, it might be difficult and involve a painful discovery process if for some reason the Note Well had to be enforced in a lawsuit.  So while keeping an archive places an additional burden on Hosnieh, it is probably a win for other participants.

(And yes, I realize you were talking to the other Ted... :)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email