Re: SDNAuth - Secure SDN authentication and authorization - Interested?

Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Wed, 04 February 2015 14:29 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46C51A00A7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 06:29:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.664
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.664 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wQzrozf71qyt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 06:29:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lvps5-35-241-16.dedicated.hosteurope.de (www.gondrom.org [5.35.241.16]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 589331A0071 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 06:29:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [125.35.58.145] (unknown [125.35.58.145]) by lvps5-35-241-16.dedicated.hosteurope.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E425662CC4; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:29:35 +0100 (CET)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=Gk1kpfxJUp08WiLAjmJd27iXWLQWBD1azKRzujH1D7pmgicM3j6O54YwXE1tWBJGxud2GS5to5GlL6t5ZfmsvbMYbCu7hDuAzgX6vY9Ip6utbCecIoESqU+/Y9ClK8izhxcDkK4M9yRLrOiPTHpR6TcqZZL96Q20N++XalDoljs=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type;
Message-ID: <54D22CC4.6040305@gondrom.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 22:29:24 +0800
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted.Lemon@nominum.com
Subject: Re: SDNAuth - Secure SDN authentication and authorization - Interested?
X-Priority: 4 (Low)
References: <012901d03692$cdc46630$694d3290$@rozanak.com> <CA+9kkMApUS=y0zNg7GDHGogU9tG=s=WwuEuy=OGdQAdCuYczOg@mail.gmail.com> <54D17283.7080708@gondrom.org> <EB9AAE7B-9756-4CB2-8CB2-CEB973306C82@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <EB9AAE7B-9756-4CB2-8CB2-CEB973306C82@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000002060702050805070109"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zSSg_LrCPw3o9H_d203Cp8Ckt0Y>
Cc: ted.ietf@gmail.com, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 14:29:40 -0000

On 04/02/15 21:12, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2015, at 6:14 PM, Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> wrote:
>> just fyi: the mailing-list does on its sign-up page (in the first line) make the explicit statement to operate under the IETF Notewell:https://mail.rozanak.com/mailman/listinfo/sdnauth
> That's precisely what I would advise doing in this situation.   It might be worth adding that the list is informal and is not sponsored by the IETF, though; otherwise people might get the impression that it's an official IETF mailing list.   You should also disclose whether or not the list is being archived, although since it's not an IETF mailing list, whether you do so is not up to us.   If the list is not archived, however, it might be difficult and involve a painful discovery process if for some reason the Note Well had to be enforced in a lawsuit.  So while keeping an archive places an additional burden on Hosnieh, it is probably a win for other participants.
>
> (And yes, I realize you were talking to the other Ted... :)
>

Just fyi: I am not the administrator of the mailing-list. I just 
happened to sign-up and noticed that the notewell is/was already there 
on the sign-up page. It seems the new list only got needed up as the Sec 
AD (Kathleen) shut down the previous IETF BOF mailing-list.

And to answer your second question: it appears the new list is being 
archived, as is also a basic mailman function.

Best regards, Tobias