Re: language diversity (was: Re: Diversity considerations)
Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 02 October 2018 21:11 UTC
Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A939F13123B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OJg8N0yLThs3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3EE21311ED for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6741D7F0F0; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=BHq/BgCYgf3XON e/Ukk1vFLgFXo=; b=imX3WEN9uri++Sq/QmEfmCJF7zoL+c62GiCiYlXbFJiYHw CrMVbRa4bLvIIivkemfrO7655ZqTpoDic/pnw17j5LSeIkwNUxPjNxqhVtGsKuys m/J6LH5R+PJjkfi28U5gHPyPsV4bbAOxTZf1BPVJ/32/GOpQywNZUCrdcT0ok=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6938B7F9C8; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:10:53 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a33
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a33
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: language diversity (was: Re: Diversity considerations)
Message-ID: <20181002211053.GI2164@localhost>
References: <b03e8de5-0fe1-bd27-7120-ffa129419bb6@lounge.org> <20181001222809.3F0302006310CD@ary.qy> <329713946.3214245.1538439079088@mail.yahoo.com> <20181002191308.4j7tqsjmn2muem5k@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1810021531350.19017@ary.qy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1810021531350.19017@ary.qy>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3GMeyYdCiry7kQFDS3tKIrs6foM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 21:11:06 -0000
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 03:34:05PM -0400, John R Levine wrote: > >IMHO, english is _the_ language of international communications, > >and the primary goal should be to give strong guidance to countries to > >have kids speak and write english fluently. ... > > Sorry, but this completely misses the point I was making. I agree that it > makes sense for the IETF to do its work in English. > > But there are several billion people in the world who for various reasons do > not speak English, or prefer to speak their own langauge to each other. > Wouldn't it be nice if the Internet worked for them, too? That's why I want > people who understand how their own languages work and can check the > assumptions we make who speak English and other languages written in the > Latin alphabet. You two are talking past each other. Our specs should be written in English. Our protocols should be internationalized. I don't think you'll find anyone here who disagrees with either or both of those two statements. Your point has been, I think, that you would like to see more participants whose first languages are not English, or at least who have useful things to say about internationalization that we might not. I continue to say that mostly we should work with the UC on difficult I18N problems and rely on them (since they have change control on Unicode). Those diverse participants who could help us with I18N should *also* be helping the UC. I realize that the structure of the UC makes that difficult, so they're better off participating at least here. I wish the UC was more like the IETF. I don't think we can change that. Nico --
- Fwd: General non-confidential input to NomCom Brian E Carpenter
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom Aaron Falk
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom Nick Hilliard
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom Eliot Lear
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom Joel Halpern
- Re: Fwd: General non-confidential input to NomCom Randy Bush
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom Theodore V Faber
- Re: Fwd: General non-confidential input to NomCom Brian Haberman
- Re: Fwd: General non-confidential input to NomCom Eliot Lear
- Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-co… John C Klensin
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… Eliot Lear
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… John C Klensin
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: Fwd: General non-confidential input to NomCom Ted Hardie
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… Melinda Shore
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom Alissa Cooper
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Diversity considerations Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Diversity considerations Melinda Shore
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity considerations Padmadevi Pillay Esnault
- Re: Diversity considerations Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: Diversity considerations Padmadevi Pillay Esnault
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Fwd: General non-confidential input to NomCom Randy Bush
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Diversity considerations Michael Richardson
- Re: Diversity considerations Michael Richardson
- Re: Diversity considerations Padmadevi Pillay Esnault
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity considerations Melinda Shore
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Diversity considerations S Moonesamy
- Re: Diversity considerations Dave Cridland
- Re: Diversity considerations Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: Diversity considerations S Moonesamy
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… Mallory Knodel
- Re: Diversity considerations Joel Halpern
- Re: Diversity considerations Mallory Knodel
- Re: Diversity considerations Christian Huitema
- Re: Diversity considerations Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: Diversity considerations Eliot Lear
- Re: Diversity considerations Mallory Knodel
- Re: Diversity considerations Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Diversity considerations Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity considerations Nico Williams
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… Fernando Gont
- Re: Diversity considerations Lloyd Wood
- Re: Diversity considerations Mallory Knodel
- Re: Diversity considerations Lloyd Wood
- Re: Diversity considerations Ole Troan
- Re: Diversity considerations Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: Diversity considerations Alissa Cooper
- Re: Diversity considerations Nico Williams
- Re: Diversity considerations Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity considerations Alissa Cooper
- Re: Diversity considerations Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Diversity considerations Fernando Gont
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… S Moonesamy
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… Melinda Shore
- Re: Diversity considerations Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… S Moonesamy
- Re: Diversity considerations Nico Williams
- Re: Diversity considerations Michael Richardson
- Re: Diversity considerations tom petch
- Re: Diversity considerations Randy Bush
- Re: Diversity considerations Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Diversity considerations Benjamin Kaduk
- acknowledging reviewers better (was Re: Diversity… Michael Richardson
- Re: acknowledging reviewers better (was Re: Diver… Nico Williams
- Re: Diversity considerations John C Klensin
- Re: Diversity considerations Melinda Shore
- Re: Diversity considerations Dave Cridland
- Re: Diversity considerations Dave Cridland
- Re: Diversity considerations Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Diversity considerations Daniel Harkins
- Re: Diversity considerations Ted Hardie
- Re: Diversity considerations John Levine
- Re: Diversity considerations Daniel Harkins
- Re: Diversity considerations John C Klensin
- Re: Diversity considerations Ted Hardie
- Re: Diversity considerations Lloyd Wood
- Re: Diversity considerations John C Klensin
- Re: Diversity considerations John C Klensin
- Re: Diversity considerations Eliot Lear
- Re: Diversity considerations John C Klensin
- Re: Diversity considerations S Moonesamy
- Re: acknowledging reviewers better (was Re: Diver… John C Klensin
- Re: acknowledging reviewers better (was Re: Diver… Michael Richardson
- Re: Diversity considerations Eliot Lear
- Re: Diversity considerations Yoav Nir
- Re: Diversity considerations John R Levine
- Re: Diversity considerations Yoav Nir
- Re: Diversity considerations John R Levine
- Re: Diversity considerations Padmadevi Pillay Esnault
- language diversity (was: Re: Diversity considerat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: acknowledging reviewers better (was Re: Diver… Toerless Eckert
- Re: language diversity (was: Re: Diversity consid… John R Levine
- Re: language diversity (was: Re: Diversity consid… Nico Williams
- Re: language diversity (was: Re: Diversity consid… Toerless Eckert
- Re: acknowledging reviewers better (was Re: Diver… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Diversity considerations Lloyd Wood
- Re: Diversity considerations tom petch
- Re: Diversity considerations Mallory Knodel
- Re: Diversity considerations S Moonesamy
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General no… Lloyd Wood