Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area
Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 21 September 2005 09:49 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EI1EB-0000Kf-CE; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:49:23 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EI1E9-0000KV-37 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:49:21 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA08505 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:49:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EI1K8-0004Tl-6u for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:55:33 -0400
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3099E258082; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:48:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27253-10; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:48:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from halvestr-w2k02.emea.cisco.com (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BEE3258062; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:48:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:46:08 +0200
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: David Kessens <david.kessens@nokia.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <F16CDA1AF9CB7E30993E6B46@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
In-Reply-To: <20050921000225.GD6496@nokia.com>
References: <20050921000225.GD6496@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.3 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081
Cc:
Subject: Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0622862927=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
David, as you know, I have been very worried about the size of the IESG too. And I've even used that argument in the discussion of some other suggestions that would add people to the IESG - I did not see that the benefits of those other proposals were higher than the costs. But - I think this proposal is addressing a well known problem; the division of groups between APPS and Transport hasn't made sense for at least the last 10 years, and the realignment suggested makes the divisions a little more reasonable. When people's thoughts align to the point where doing a sensible thing to this problem is possible, it is my opinion that it is time to do it. Once Brian's PESCI group gets off the ground, and if they ask for my input, I'll certainly recommend that they recommend to the community that they do drastic surgery to the effective group size of the IESG - the -twolevel- draft was one suggestion for how that could be done. But adding another area can be done NOW, and (in my opinion) won't delay the solution to the "size" problem - which (in my opinion) has to be solved anyway. In my opinion, the benefits outweigh the costs. Harald
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- RE: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Yaakov Stein
- Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and In… David Kessens
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… John C Klensin
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Dave Crocker
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Scott Bradner
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… David Kessens
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… David Kessens
- RE: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Yaakov Stein
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Melinda Shore
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Thomas Narten
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… James M. Polk
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… David Kessens
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… C Wegrzyn
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Melinda Shore
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Nicholas Staff
- Adding parallelism? (was Re: Cost vs. Benefit of … Pekka Nikander
- RE: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Yaakov Stein
- Re: Adding parallelism? (was Re: Cost vs. Benefit… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications an… Jari Arkko
- Re: Adding parallelism? (was Re: Cost vs. Benefit… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Adding parallelism? (was Re: Cost vs. Benefit… Sam Hartman
- Re: Adding parallelism? (was Re: Cost vs. Benefit… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Adding parallelism? (was Re: Cost vs. Benefit… Pekka Nikander
- Re: Adding parallelism? (was Re: Cost vs. Benefit… Brian E Carpenter