IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 13 October 2017 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BD51332D7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P0YusdueIDDv for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E8B013243A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6A3200A5; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:29:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C3D80E85; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:23:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-ergSJvmzzOCaNP-iEk1i80UCpst-oaHpVoZg8PxFZRTw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKKJt-fAaNPeeuSfS0Dv6vTAOXR=OS2XSKqPVMyxxr1O1tLwBg@mail.gmail.com> <7d45859d-6efc-5576-e413-8c9162c42776@gmail.com> <CAKKJt-ergSJvmzzOCaNP-iEk1i80UCpst-oaHpVoZg8PxFZRTw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:23:41 -0400
Message-ID: <16416.1507915421@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4j0QPRSY1g0SwQHTtk6E_x-eLSk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 17:23:44 -0000

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
    > I've been saying for a while that much of the new work proposals we see
    > that's interesting, spans working groups and even areas, so I think this is
    > "one or more new or revised charters".

I am of the opinion that the decision as to which area it belongs in is among
the lowest order bits of the decision, particularly in light of ADs may
manage groups outside of their area.

To me the AREA tag only really determines some bits of culture (which is
slightly different across areas), and some minor assumptions about conflict
scheduling.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email