IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Sun, 15 October 2017 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922D7133064 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 11:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lvPUfGLMpMKf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 11:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 174201270AB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 11:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2114; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1508093515; x=1509303115; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=omnPhmPiWmZ2nJXhsy6Kj6n2n9NIDV+9DQfQc7acTlA=; b=lgJEwB4vbDKr8eZ2DUTDrVKJtqV855GjB8DpM7/0BOlfhoeVF14lkMlH wN8orGzxGM3QvRRpoii9kAU/5aOJ5BSXmFdvXQduqOQLblz/2D0mfM2k5 WoWUoF2epcVx+DjhLavrsAx8++XTW/MXtoqoDk/XXQx5Dnz+QOyiBpGK3 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BfAgDlreNZ/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhTGEIYsTkBEili+CFAcDhTsChRcWAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFHgEFI1YQCxgqAgJXBgEMCAEBihmqTYIniygBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQERD4MthUIrC4J0gSSGdIJhAQShSIQ9giGEY4kqgXsBiWiHMnCUf4E5JgwlQoEXNCEIHRWDLoRgPosTAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,383,1503360000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="655464044"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Oct 2017 18:51:53 +0000
Received: from [10.61.171.61] ([10.61.171.61]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9FIpqGi008774; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 18:51:52 GMT
Subject: Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <CAKKJt-fAaNPeeuSfS0Dv6vTAOXR=OS2XSKqPVMyxxr1O1tLwBg@mail.gmail.com> <7d45859d-6efc-5576-e413-8c9162c42776@gmail.com> <CAKKJt-ergSJvmzzOCaNP-iEk1i80UCpst-oaHpVoZg8PxFZRTw@mail.gmail.com> <16416.1507915421@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <aab5c229-4ab7-5105-2056-85231b48a828@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 20:51:50 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <16416.1507915421@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TbkJ2iRwOoIqTG6BmRtbbe8fEGdkLvrur"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BrRhKS79xNJgpodkyj2qSP6HdAo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 18:51:56 -0000

Hi,

On 10/13/17 7:23 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> I am of the opinion that the decision as to which area it belongs in is among
> the lowest order bits of the decision, particularly in light of ADs may
> manage groups outside of their area.

Except that you have to start somewhere.  And our documentation isn't up
to date.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email