IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Tue, 20 August 2013 23:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@apple.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB55111E8141; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TKVmdglMowfd; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (honeycrisp.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613A611E8134; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from relay6.apple.com ([17.128.113.90]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MRU0026XT9AVTQ0@mail-out.apple.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1180715a-b7f8e6d000006c98-a8-5214029ea4c9
Received: from aniseed.apple.com (aniseed.apple.com [17.128.115.23]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay6.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 7F.A5.27800.F9204125; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kallisti.apple.com ([17.193.13.64]) by aniseed.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0MRU007VPT9ACN00@aniseed.apple.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <CAKD1Yr1VpJne1h-Q5xbNMYRhpr_n0Wmn6UqfeG3vEg2MY6ms1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:58:22 -0700
Message-id: <A4B538DE-16B9-45D4-89F3-51441984B12F@apple.com>
References: <20130819135219.8236.40060.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr1VpJne1h-Q5xbNMYRhpr_n0Wmn6UqfeG3vEg2MY6ms1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: v6ops@ietf.org, WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1793.4)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FAsrjufSSTI4Mh6NotnG+ezWJw+tpfZ gcljyZKfTAGMUVw2Kak5mWWpRfp2CVwZb5f8YixYz1Jx/0ArawPjDuYuRk4OCQETiV9HG1kg bDGJC/fWs3UxcnEICfQzSTx8PZEJwmllkmg++IIdpIpZQEei9/s3oG4ODl4BA4nPDT4gNcIC axklXuzZyQRSwyagIvHt8l0wm1MgWGLCgXesIDaLgKrEuY0z2SDmKEu8OfOfCcLWlnjy7gJY Da+AjcSltfPZIRa3M0rc7zoA1iAioC6x+spRRohT5SXafv9km8AoMAvJTbMQbpqFZOwCRuZV jAJFqTmJlWZ6iQUFOal6yfm5mxjBQVgYtYOxYbnVIUYBDkYlHl7OEuEgIdbEsuLK3EOMEhzM SiK8O74ChXhTEiurUovy44tKc1KLDzFKc7AoifPu1QBKCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbBZJk4OKUaGFPu CW8KFfHd2Liv6J7s3VBvnWJG4wmzX7Q8rL6hWnHrqWqLTt3+XYsvnor6sPKHwJ7byqu3XQvd xBHrsOlCk/j/VY+4o9TX9aTqrvOU+fqJYUKXqVTDpuvmQtP9fh5x/pT0JOtzrcfk01MmrGEW 3vIv30T2QcEh3sMqGdvyrNLETgZq7PRq0VBiKc5INNRiLipOBABmCbu0PgIAAA==
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:58:34 -0000

On Aug 20, 2013, at 02:39 , Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> 
> [...] It seems to me that the sheer length of the list, and the fact that is not prioritized, create a real risk that implementors will simply write it off as wishful thinking or even shy away in terror. [...]

My views on the technical merits of this draft remain unchanged from the last time I offered them here, and I am basically in agreement with Lorenzo.  This draft seems unnecessary to me.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
core os networking

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email