IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC

Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Thu, 22 August 2013 11:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74C511E819E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 04:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2SF2HeSoAdZp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 04:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com (mail-ob0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6035311E81A4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 04:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id ta17so3338088obb.32 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 04:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=bvc1TOFiJ2nJx4hEUrNwPJxXXfm1lVnMtoMnldBnr90=; b=GGRupLOYPz/u+0gQJ+HXsUPUIYPQG9tbFDiRx0uJz0c6LBSugvZxNdmvuUbKQVeiT7 Q8ecqQBGIIgWHsYRKY8GFh6ARDA62czq5xCBGlag+ogzgM7XwxhG8cdmmBc9tovZp3yP RESDflEmR1J0V17PZzle5L8rysoEZ3BK5AdbIT9gbi1ef5fcD4CiGndJjlqZVfl8X+K7 8mahYrXFPO9I+KbeJEbDPxHeRZ91xlzsmoFJNVeAA88keW/916QkJwCxaviqtiCP/WMt EVnACCPdL9/SlrpI/oMqY5YM/qSy/WCdWmMx+Ni3M662wGpdFrMcooTrFc5RfMCA8Hxa lWOg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=bvc1TOFiJ2nJx4hEUrNwPJxXXfm1lVnMtoMnldBnr90=; b=oaiiFwOmgWKKw7RAeL4LrySyQkXdgCiwHOX3wPOUOv169kYDO+l7YoX/B48Ow4P0w6 gLwKK6Crxyv+M+szo/rUxw2p64BO6XQ+N5poiCn/AsnfaS5luCWM769k6Ccq2866zr+j bxROyxyIzswKuPyJlMe6oD15hq6pQC53MgI1cGNrFhBLdW/GjV1gjWEglhEcRfILamoH ouNxr/xSSFT7Hpwq/gbj43e8B5T0a0+k/DjNVAufAda+2h37UHm4yvu1YsJfGpP/ofdf Y99ybViKMyHeo0zZ81VBMghxGdr3OUQJ1Ove9a+auFq6J5FQEcX2R9aU496uZ1lsgs4W c83w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn0YMtXS1aybB77my4wgd5t7vbSXQbfV/JGclMWO1zd4hUaxa1vpv+XT0pNd/fdo/LqhnlEXKWL5G6m7s5t9m4xvom+1bInm+koaOFFKxgFqzfXS3JKgNYGYTYTmXTbngDAY7cRb+KBH2GphNv3mz29jXPp9PezYHL9GX6BvdRrQm0yXWh/KEWtw0UKxDqWNhSJ2qkD
X-Received: by 10.60.120.69 with SMTP id la5mr1511908oeb.86.1377170520458; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 04:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.56.226 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 04:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E52BC6E6-DB55-49A5-B3AA-6D57451676ED@delong.com>
References: <20130819135219.8236.40060.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr1VpJne1h-Q5xbNMYRhpr_n0Wmn6UqfeG3vEg2MY6ms1g@mail.gmail.com> <A4B538DE-16B9-45D4-89F3-51441984B12F@apple.com> <E52BC6E6-DB55-49A5-B3AA-6D57451676ED@delong.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:21:38 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAedzxqsCox1rRo620MzFziBPpq1dAmzN6ZA1bcE0AXJCh_2Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:15:29 -0700
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:22:04 -0000

REQ 1:
    6434 5.9.1 is already a MUST.  This does not need to be repeated.
    6434 5.8 is already a MUST.  Unless you want to make multipart
ICMP a MUST (why?) as well, this too can be removed.

REQ 6:
    re 6434 12.2, this MUST does not appear to be stronger than 12.2's MUST
    frankly even 5.2 reads like MUST for 3GPP, but it does SHOULD so
this MUST appears stronger.  Bizarre, though, I never noticed that "ND
SHOULD" before.

REQ 10:
    this reads kind weird.  In REQ 9 you require 6106 support, but in
REQ 10 you say "if 6106 is not supported."  I think you mean something
like "if the network to which the mobile node is attaching does not
support 6016".

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email