IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 16 October 2017 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4D7132D22 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id niFJzwQ6a8EQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x232.google.com (mail-qt0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F59D132320 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x232.google.com with SMTP id n61so31702791qte.10 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yC85+QmjYbhCiFdxk/RN2NsQ6CgfRMBjzXzqTMa3WcU=; b=WO10Xoez+JXOOL8bzeWdl66f0ZEZtDNWg1/Hxr9Q5ut94Qxe32j4NeFYsgxGBs+zBD JrJvig0Qc7AySpnlWySo9MUZjDZJEXTQ138N4cVvAw8Q7kikEKDfG4pvmWAsLKUbk8WH NO8N231FWItkKUqaYPcg2IHxD9d8ilgNsgy8ItEAQ1ADdmIcfZjVdAwHkLuCNzgYzAuO sdPPLmxOzcz9E0A2at630PRixQii9tCtfRxABniXdptw344QOXd3qarny0/TKmVG5dyV V/75OD01LZ40ZMPIwLot/lUnsJPUErLLajzUOK3Ro8Hb6XP548uU3DHf6plXeh4kcrU9 9SOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yC85+QmjYbhCiFdxk/RN2NsQ6CgfRMBjzXzqTMa3WcU=; b=eRImyERBHdSJ8zV/ebjiqK1+pFgwKdZhKgxnkPEdqw73CX5Z9xJhuvO2l1u1SFhm29 MiaXpIJ6mLm+rGWLlT1DV9+BQnCczPoVugb8Gv/LHgcpKyLls357Seq/s6bie2451Sdq GUT0uZSOj8ghmlaNPw6exgLKw1EsfmWvsyaNUnq91WbVmDrUNBhQpOc7RuORlZevjuYp wHAhk8cLk6c1hQ2Eco7ap2tzoJXOcJ0PNHb8GkrjEVSlPRfo3mgR2mhvBNglgsfMHY4S DKVBu3+EGk9tA8uK6SgfGIAdcZwdzieHVuKVK9558tvsVQAs2ETpjexnv69F0Vk/3ZRT 6tAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVakOyid0wuMirXF2pbNGOq1wvyAIQ+CnLuiwKNIchCy96vMMcR +oEqoY7pVHTDP5j4fnMAOb+LxZ3ScK/BOeBPsho=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TdVEQG65lrJkVgeQ1TG8kBSKIZPjwI2Py2ZkpTC89GwgXNDdWy7n8wHr3pwaUGYrc9u/AQtxKUmZ6CmWVyh9k=
X-Received: by 10.129.129.198 with SMTP id r189mr450906ywf.448.1508161919310; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.87.131 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <aab5c229-4ab7-5105-2056-85231b48a828@cisco.com>
References: <CAKKJt-fAaNPeeuSfS0Dv6vTAOXR=OS2XSKqPVMyxxr1O1tLwBg@mail.gmail.com> <7d45859d-6efc-5576-e413-8c9162c42776@gmail.com> <CAKKJt-ergSJvmzzOCaNP-iEk1i80UCpst-oaHpVoZg8PxFZRTw@mail.gmail.com> <16416.1507915421@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <aab5c229-4ab7-5105-2056-85231b48a828@cisco.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 08:51:58 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-dmb5sMEjaJktSm7QBtFXmpO5rhW4k_kWRp1kYf1Yr1og@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0812f276e35c055baa4fa6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7CsKQo6cAZB_Xk9rlRrncxjGFSA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:52:01 -0000

Hi, Eliot,

On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 10/13/17 7:23 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> > I am of the opinion that the decision as to which area it belongs in is
> among
> > the lowest order bits of the decision, particularly in light of ADs may
> > manage groups outside of their area.
>
> Except that you have to start somewhere.  And our documentation isn't up
> to date.


Could you say more about that? It sounds like something needs to be fixed.

Thanks,

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email