IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-sullivan-nomcom-chair-select-00

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 15 February 2022 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D143C3A0F92 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:07:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WY58DN3CZvRr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:06:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E920C3A0F64 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A096389F8; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:15:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id mHrun4CaEezT; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:15:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2157B389F5; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:15:00 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1644948900; bh=xZkgB+1h8kYCTrQkTQAQjG3xJcaFZjBkYjR40jdNvls=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=hvHkhNKUOyjZsAg/Tf8Ahv6y4zHutGYP90YVqhU3wwx+CvjYH+mcneHksbLndgpVr ESbtyl7VHUxLKOd7IZoJ3vMJttM6MbBdWPMDxLooPCyGOayH064KE1lYqwCMezQe+t QBouL9ObsS7na+OcrC7xLgXXBLtSfyHQvtmmU1spkcsGD5LzIq07D2XkCk3bpAmQfO gY5L9EGx9lFM9disJkwThG3HVrUH4jg6JoInmIZ8EKJpyXH5Zl6zsXNwxbRuok5pGj /0pGPsUvbo+My+xruhcCNoIsdTXCbN1dqLH5XF0kKtmfpktAuST6cmtm2eYOxhxiiV FA7UdjKAu7+fg==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6CF754; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:06:55 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-sullivan-nomcom-chair-select-00
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEGuwjM9oTYC3R3-tSrDtichLHsPqi0ysw0=6rrXuxyLEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20220214055405.v7qujqp5lmqynga5@outlook.office365.com> <CAF4+nEGuwjM9oTYC3R3-tSrDtichLHsPqi0ysw0=6rrXuxyLEg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:06:55 -0500
Message-ID: <3457.1644948415@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7xIzfhnJE3holTEVhqepKyNTajg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 18:07:03 -0000

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Unless I missed it, I think there is no prohibition in this against
    > picking a former NomCom Chair. I'm pretty sure that has never been
    > done and I think it should be prohibited.

Why should we prohibit this?
We have 23+ experienced nomcom chairs, some of whom might be retired now and
available.   It's not like it's a voting position.

(Not sure I would agree to do it again)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email