Re: draft-sullivan-nomcom-chair-select-00

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 16 February 2022 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E173A100B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:58:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.792
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.792 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u0Km5kN8bTVV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:58:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67F703A144D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.114] ([47.186.48.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 21GIvvNG052223 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:57:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1645037878; bh=NFZJjGGrLkKu9xCvvFRfTgjvhwHNup1tzYrY1UJZILk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=qpTB2LLLQRyOuJTtJ/rwmhZddkB3o0c6+qduxqnv8qFN9ZtekF/GRHjkkehCQfEh2 NJkCBIvzLzasZHtFuCYi564WSQH7eWZfMw8Fgt/XHJ/n6QyR2UPBS8/AyG+PVflHhl 5cF6DuvwbU2LPYKepe+4TEIWdwTUbN2jQehUqkDs=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.48.51] claimed to be [192.168.1.114]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------0JStcVyvOxSmXHeqHU9axo7H"
Message-ID: <6b6e35bf-d593-499b-b495-a76069d2dfdb@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:57:52 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.0
Subject: Re: draft-sullivan-nomcom-chair-select-00
Content-Language: en-US
To: Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>, Andrew Sullivan <sullivan@isoc.org>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20220214055405.v7qujqp5lmqynga5@outlook.office365.com> <29520.1644947140@localhost> <20220215184908.66t45a2znx6tbulc@outlook.office365.com> <CABmDk8nTP4XQrWZ12ZasCk3fq-ixFiyRxBiu7VEhoy2WwKpP8g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABmDk8nTP4XQrWZ12ZasCk3fq-ixFiyRxBiu7VEhoy2WwKpP8g@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/MoB-Lh4KRdm-he-BFHdFMLt76pk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 18:58:08 -0000

On 2/15/22 1:07 PM, Mary B wrote:
>
>
>
> [MB] Past Nomcoms had a dinner at the March IETF that was part of the 
> Nomcom budget.   So, that was at least something to show the work was 
> appreciated.  And, in general leadership is given some sort of 
> gift and given plaques when they've served 2 or more years, so it does 
> seem appropriate that Nomcom chairs, who also serve the community for 
> 2 years, also get some token recognition other than a name on slides.  
> [/MB]
>
>
This seems a good place to remind ourselves that there have now been 
several nomcoms who didn't get to have dinner (yet).

RjS