IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2418bis-01.txt

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> Mon, 22 October 2018 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F3912896A; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 07:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BgnYnIjcTu2P; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 07:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com [162.150.44.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E434512870E; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 07:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: a2962c47-316d49e000003e3c-71-5bcddd42c752
Received: from COPDCEXC35.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhoutvip.cable.comcast.com [96.114.156.147]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id 9E.B3.15932.24DDDCB5; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 08:22:58 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.136) by COPDCEXC35.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:23:09 -0400
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94]) by COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94%15]) with mapi id 15.01.1466.009; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:23:09 -0400
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "iasa20@ietf.org" <iasa20@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2418bis-01.txt
Thread-Topic: [Iasa20] draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2418bis-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHUaLIWWpnqiALk7Em/K8gy6dO0QqUo45cAgAAFbgCAABXTgIACVLOA
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 14:23:09 +0000
Message-ID: <2A42A5D2-9785-4350-92A5-0FDFD54AD17F@cable.comcast.com>
References: <4915CD062D28D607D3D4AD44@PSB> <8906b727-f9c3-e7e1-164b-f7b88e48e74b@gmail.com> <1C77C07809EFB402E3E10907@PSB> <DE6E9C0D-C46B-4010-9E6D-8438DE687275@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <DE6E9C0D-C46B-4010-9E6D-8438DE687275@sobco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.3.181015
x-originating-ip: [68.87.29.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <F885743D4D8EF14AA4B9C7F961043015@comcast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprPKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWSUDRnsq7T3bPRBq//mFgsmb6RyeLZxvks Fsc7lR2YPZYs+cnk8eLAN+YApqgGRpuSjKLUxBKX1LTUvOJUOy4FDGCTlJqWX5TqmliUUxmU mpOaiF0ZSGVKak5mWWqRPlZj9LGak9DFlPFx5xGmgm8cFb/n7mVrYLzB0cXIySEhYCJxb9Fk 1i5GLg4hgV1MEp031zJCOC1MEr2PnkI5pxklPp+azAzSwiZgJnF34RUwW0QgT2LB0v8sILaw gIXE3i+L2boYOYDilhK3N6lDlLhJfL+9kQnEZhFQlbh4ZR+YzSvgInFj6xpGEFtIYCOjxJw9 PiA2p4CtxP8jN8BGMgqISXw/tQasnllAXOLWk/lMEFcLSCzZc54ZwhaVePn4HyuILSqgL7F7 wnFGiLi8xJEJ/1hAzmEW0JRYv0sfYoyVxPZJf1khbEWJKd0P2SHOEZQ4OfMJC0SruMThIztY JzBKzEKyeRbCpFlIJs1CMmkWkkkLGFlXMfIamhnpGZoa6JmY6JkbbmIEJptF03TcdzB+OB97 iFGAg1GJh9fwwNloIdbEsuLK3EOMEhzMSiK8K5cAhXhTEiurUovy44tKc1KLDzFKc7AoifOG G5yKFhJITyxJzU5NLUgtgskycXBKNTDmzxM9zFPWKpzx9tCSkzM179zx36JWmjvRK7MtsDK2 rM5qyswvBg58MXqnDvHu1Wdik9pntUf2+LFGhV8nzSbqfdNw+iPktOqtTGtMrOT6dWddbrFM sxR85+X841pcoZFWiu70k31bHgk0Phavd5Fo5Hhx/1SdwFp73v2sc3X+7tvh09rm8EOJpTgj 0VCLuag4EQABYL8ZMgMAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/E79MZVy0Dqld3SYRyv873-EQxdw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 14:23:15 -0000

We debated the update tactic some months ago. It seemed whatever path we took, we might be criticized but we had to pick one. This is very nearly the final document in that long list, so it is interesting that its really only one of the last few to see this issue raised. Of course it seems quite possible we'll now spend more time debating it on email lists that it'd take to produce the document updates. ;-) 

JL

On 10/20/18, 6:45 PM, "iasa20 on behalf of Scott O. Bradner" <iasa20-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of sob@sobco.com> wrote:

    sure seems a lot more efficient to just have one short RFC instead of a bunch of RFCs that wind
    up changing well known RFC #s for almost no meaningful changes - i
    
    (never mind having to change training documents to point to the changed RFC numbers)
    
Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email