IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG position on NAT traversal and IPv4/IPv6

"Tadayuki HATTORI" <taddyhatty@nifty.com> Wed, 17 November 2010 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <taddyhatty@nifty.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7823A6929 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:39:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jzpMR8iXNOKj for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:39:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from msag503.nifty.com (msag503.nifty.com [202.248.238.124]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911B63A6904 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:39:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from GATEWAY (EM114-48-134-204.pool.e-mobile.ne.jp [114.48.134.204]) (authenticated) by msag503.nifty.com with ESMTP id oAHFdw2J015145; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:40:01 +0900
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=apr2010msa; t=1290008405; bh=RZo+k2IjAXYc9Q/EBHzxNHW6+lQEUt+d3xGUsmARuhw=; h=Message-ID:Reply-To:From:To:Cc:References:Subject:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=F8iM4Q+JTd0J4/I2GJndemmvoLNesHXZY31Li/ohBz0NigK7uXCiVjg0I7COPxiJz +qscg+cjFzOeMy4Um2LV5H5/Jd03GifJfqCQkwzHRiE05kW+Mw2Xky4Nek5frLfii5 KMAfkMf7i3XJwWVURnJ87fFhMGcjIb96x4ikE/cg=
X-Nifty-SrcIP: [114.48.134.204]
Message-ID: <9FA1943255AB4B148A5F21AFDDE8BBD4@GATEWAY>
From: Tadayuki HATTORI <taddyhatty@nifty.com>
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, mrex@sap.com
References: <201011161843.oAGIhufE027562@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp> <4CE3D4A4.2010209@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: IESG position on NAT traversal and IPv4/IPv6
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:39:57 +0900
Organization: TaddyHatty
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994
Cc: hallam@gmail.com, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Tadayuki HATTORI <taddyhatty@nifty.com>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:39:25 -0000

At first, would you like to confirm the protocol is rgiht or wrong,
according to the constitutions of each nation.

It's the matter of right or wrong, not legal or illegal, isn't it?

---
TaddyHatty, 　


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Masataka Ohta" <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: <mrex@sap.com>
Cc: <hallam@gmail.com>; <ietf@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: IESG position on NAT traversal and IPv4/IPv6


> Martin Rex wrote:
>
>>> According to your theory, a universal NAT traversal protocol
>>> should already exists.
>>
>> Correct.  It is called the HTTP CONNECT method.
>
> If, with your definition of "traversal", tunneling is a form
> of traversal, tunneling by IPSEC is a standard firewall
> traversal protocol and is much better than HTTP CONNECT
> because of UDP.
>
> So, we are done.
>
> Masataka Ohta
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email