IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG position on NAT traversal and IPv4/IPv6

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Mon, 15 November 2010 12:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307FA3A6C9A for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:18:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.154
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.154 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.716, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2239IjOx4fkL for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B2463A6C96 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:18:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 75626 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2010 12:52:36 -0000
Received: from softbank219001188004.bbtec.net (HELO ?192.168.1.21?) (219.1.188.4) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 15 Nov 2010 12:52:36 -0000
Message-ID: <4CE12517.4080908@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:18:31 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IESG position on NAT traversal and IPv4/IPv6
References: <F443844F-67B6-418F-9E32-B2F498686650@acmepacket.com> <4CE0F9D9.2050002@ericsson.com> <4CE1228F.3090409@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <4CE1228F.3090409@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:18:52 -0000

Jari Arkko wrote:

> NAT/FW traversal is also important even 
> with IPv6, as you may have a firewall even in IPv6 (or be going through 
> a NAT64).

FYI, traversable firewall is, by definition, broken.

						Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email