Re: IESG position on NAT traversal and IPv4/IPv6

Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com> Tue, 16 November 2010 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mrex@sap.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061793A6DB5 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:43:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.139, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48GDSKJ1Qr3n for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:43:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpde01.sap-ag.de (smtpde01.sap-ag.de [155.56.68.170]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC073A6BA6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:43:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sap.corp by smtpde01.sap-ag.de (26) with ESMTP id oAGIhv9J017356 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:43:57 +0100 (MET)
From: Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com>
Message-Id: <201011161843.oAGIhufE027562@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
Subject: Re: IESG position on NAT traversal and IPv4/IPv6
To: mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:43:56 +0100
In-Reply-To: <4CE27231.6050009@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> from "Masataka Ohta" at Nov 16, 10 08:59:45 pm
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Scanner: Virus Scanner virwal03
X-SAP: out
Cc: hallam@gmail.com, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mrex@sap.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:43:25 -0000

Masataka Ohta wrote:
> 
> According to your theory, a universal NAT traversal protocol
> should already exists.

Correct.  It is called the HTTP CONNECT method.

-Martin