Re: [IAOC] Badges and blue sheets

bill manning <bmanning@isi.edu> Tue, 16 November 2010 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <bmanning@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B153A6C33; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:50:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YPcSZL70UTym; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:50:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF8C3A6DBF; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:50:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mew.isi.edu (mew.isi.edu [128.9.160.177]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAGIlI59029194 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:47:23 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [IAOC] Badges and blue sheets
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: bill manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011160954110.19604@pita.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:47:15 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7AA41E0D-F6E2-48DC-8854-D8E59CDD3353@isi.edu>
References: <C90882B6.23A8D8%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011160954110.19604@pita.cisco.com>
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: bmanning@isi.edu
Cc: "iaoc@ietf.org" <iaoc@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:51:00 -0000

	another datapoint for those keeping score.  I am aware of people who register, pay
	and don't attend.   seems that IETF attendance is a value proposition.  

	is it worth it (to my organization/self) to spend the time, money, effort to engage in the
	IETF and its processes?   

	for some, the burden of recent years (the "note well", the slipping off of long-time support
	in favor of quasi-autonomous independence, the IPR constraints, the increase in fees) changed 
        the equation	and there are people who don't participate anymore.  I think the community
	is poorer as a result.

	perhaps we should take a leaf from the IoT community and insist on implanted RFID tags
	as our badges?   surely that would make it easier to track attendees and allow for a much
	finer grained billing structure?

--bill

  
On 16November2010Tuesday, at 10:01, Ole Jacobsen wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> 
>> Ok, so then let's ask for comp status.
>> 
>> I've been paying from my own pocket all my IETF registration and traveling
>> expenses from the last 2 years, and can't further do it, specially because
>> it seems to me that the systems is unfair if we don't have good reasons to
>> justify each case.
> 
> You make two claims without any justification: 1. The system is 
> "unfair" and 2. We don't have good reasons. Not exactly a good 
> starting point for your "application".
> 
> You are not the only person who has paid part or all his/her 
> registration and travel expenses. Welcome to the club.
> 
>> 
>> Let me know what the IAOC needs from me to justify my case. I'm happy to
>> send it publicly.
> 
> The "comp status" is given in exceptional circumstances for people who 
> really need to be present at the meeting, such as those running the 
> NOC, IESG members without corporate (or private) support etc. If you 
> fall into any of those categories, I see no reason why you could not 
> ask for support. This is at the discretion of the IETF chair in most 
> cases.
> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Jordi
>> 
>> 
> 
> Ole
> 
> Ole J. Jacobsen 
> Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
> Cisco Systems
> Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
> E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf