Re: Publishing list of non-paying IETF attendees, was Re: [IAOC] Badges and blue sheets

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sun, 14 November 2010 08:06 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2EA3A6942 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 00:06:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.421
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.421 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.178, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wVd-Yvrr-XZV for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 00:06:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D913A691A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 00:06:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.5.Alpha0/8.14.5.Alpha0) with ESMTP id oAE86vn5029399 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 00:07:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1289722046; x=1289808446; bh=hWTclW6HSjeVz4BtGVyhe5Dr2bgjQlYU6bxwBPO6R/g=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=tSy3EwMM1NgBcQ2hL6W7QqUU9A6H8RV5YVFG2fkrgetaFqervZJCo0jvUMRhTXtyO QLoIwhJn6NYaAqCu4FR9gBCMB3BAT3rcs+acWo148xmMCesgY8C9/BdnfJgGdJhzAS tF5gMyyDSMoCmm4VN1d3cvdGfo0CIznqQIISuoX0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1289722046; x=1289808446; bh=hWTclW6HSjeVz4BtGVyhe5Dr2bgjQlYU6bxwBPO6R/g=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=ThwCWd70sDkThay9nJswK0uWLRHcW5vzuoFJH3A5D8eNJnBhqcsdc73g1kuSGagki 1fZiFJNvaP7De66/odKYENu42jl1cn47dHKeoOCMSUWxQ0sl9nxJkWgqGuM/6zXiPt nOHXbydGlv835GLs8nTJIqzZmtd1YnbY25eNmA5k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=G+FhNEIbo53jgKvzPQR3UGeAeRmhrqkeay1MXYTcf9GeBz8Ps8nBvFiIjds/sMQGj x28gbdKX83oCTXGk/7w1swRxOJ5sgUDQ6+B4ee7D8v7s3qI9/xmlsxTjkakjM32MMHO DeYAII8b+DR6MF6rLFwE+8tTqT0Xb6NImHQkgCA=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20101113221018.0ba26388@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 00:06:44 -0800
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Publishing list of non-paying IETF attendees, was Re: [IAOC] Badges and blue sheets
In-Reply-To: <1289563433.5333.21.camel@shane-asus-laptop>
References: <C902F371.23A288%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <2C6CC15A-EFCC-4E0B-B4A7-A1C4BD48416B@checkpoint.com> <1289563433.5333.21.camel@shane-asus-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 08:06:58 -0000

At 04:03 12-11-10, Shane Kerr wrote:
>It is sometimes possible to create systems to meet the needs of privacy
>and oversight - for example a closed review board - but I think just
>publishing a list of who gets free access to each IETF is probably good
>a good idea.

There is already an IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (see BCP 
101).  Approximately 2% of attendees received complementary tickets.

Regards,
-sm