Re: Publishing list of non-paying IETF attendees, was Re: [IAOC] Badges and blue sheets

On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:

> 
> On Nov 14, 2010, at 10:06 AM, SM wrote:
> 
>> At 04:03 12-11-10, Shane Kerr wrote:
>>> It is sometimes possible to create systems to meet the needs of privacy
>>> and oversight - for example a closed review board - but I think just
>>> publishing a list of who gets free access to each IETF is probably good
>>> a good idea.
>> 
>> There is already an IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (see BCP 
>> 101).  Approximately 2% of attendees received complementary tickets
> 
> How many of those are volunteers/host/NOC/future host, and how many are "discretionary comp"?

There was exactly 1 "discretionary" in Beijing. 

Wearing no hats, and just my own personal opinion, this seems like making a mountain out of a molehill to me. 

Regards
Marshall

> 
> Does the IAOC have access to the actual list of names?  If so, I think that's good enough, because the corruption that we're trying to solve would require collaboration between the IETF chair and the IAOC. I would say that the risk is low enough that privacy trumps transparency.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 