IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Fwd: Re: WG Review: JSON Mail Access Protocol (jmap) - reducing configuration complexity

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 08 February 2017 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7E11295A9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:16:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42l-ivddPtZO for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x234.google.com (mail-qt0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33B10129472 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x234.google.com with SMTP id v23so178552166qtb.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:16:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=CZDM119sv8cyItjr+mP84IEGJA2Dy8+LBV96AeUwpRA=; b=ueo+CfGBrU+wRFtdx4kX4KGuH8AcNV1Vbb9zA2qVbAdWxwsZz1L5e0ne+zX/bpgpho O1wmeMvvXWxsKukhNJgGbpxKDS9TH7b8YbD+gFe2CWwjVi6DIdxAgxqM7Vg8fTExCUBT Bx/VVNVFoIz6+1tNYlZ9Tmn/tq6xNDhJrIbl4+ih/MFJXJe4HgMx1Gvj0rvQfEpFZBwS pvPaItuk+YfEiRfaSCjzdENA36TSmpMy5NxEpuRNLUTEUFqVANtIyml2H5G4FzN95kup Zq0b0kK6VyDheyRHvSZQ9vtHScBxED/X1TR+8Xsr2TcWcRcHUR9iEIEFABpvypYyxmbg Obqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=CZDM119sv8cyItjr+mP84IEGJA2Dy8+LBV96AeUwpRA=; b=qX46fsigRQDxBvaFi7aFcG7q2kGMa9YlEzMuLdoXYnioXqmeYB7keCEsKs3iBkQE1S uu1kR+g13LKkISKq1HxGBfQ72umS+y6WJbj/5n8aX5simhJc0HH7WQwUk9OL6yr6S/BF ls7iK7PnoLUA9ANaRaqlvagFiO4LpFYH3BbL4hLWyCDeXT8ObFW6bMM0PwgRvToM2Zh9 5FSH6JI4tGIa5hMs+of6Zj4hbG27jItk0EyFstLDfycBYdteHVtfceHOU9mjgFWISdR2 wMSrRnZNh3L8Y13rqR75MiMPWJUBK66yRip9b01/meV5kAmyErafL36TW6Ae8aYstBS4 Nlog==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kCzJUVaTakQ4S5mb4MAGOslPhJbB3IgWGrYm1j1wnsqLDfthfwJL4qy+PseZC+2Q==
X-Received: by 10.200.41.3 with SMTP id y3mr21029223qty.205.1486588608406; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:16:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 142sm7234959qkf.16.2017.02.08.13.16.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:16:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <3755CBD4-7614-48E1-BB80-F847934A787A@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E3CFB9AE-B84B-4446-B767-F4FF805F4BE1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Fwd: Re: WG Review: JSON Mail Access Protocol (jmap) - reducing configuration complexity
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:16:45 -0500
In-Reply-To: <589B88E4.4000208@isode.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <3b955910-12d0-2c56-0dc2-30279f98aea5@isode.com> <19fabdd7-77c5-fc13-616e-26d39d2f23df@isode.com> <20170208142241.GB84460@mx4.yitter.info> <217b1d1b-adba-2ebb-30ca-600f8dc77246@isode.com> <32D2801528D191A01AD4D3B2@PSB> <e9e8141f-0bc2-870e-c10e-d8894673e455@dcrocker.net> <589B88E4.4000208@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/HFtxUdqYEA2QEbG1MlY1ieWSI5A>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 21:16:51 -0000

On Feb 8, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
> Neil Jenkins did a very good summary of existing problems and how JMAP
> is trying to improve over IMAP:
> <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg05820.html <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg05820.html>>

Wow, this is _really_ useful.   Thank you for pointing it out.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email