RE: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case

Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com> Sun, 20 May 2012 06:26 UTC

Return-Path: <yaakov_s@rad.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A689521F85D8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 May 2012 23:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YXlV113GuH+g for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 May 2012 23:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rad.co.il (mailrelay02.rad.co.il [62.0.23.237]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FF921F85B6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 May 2012 23:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Internal Mail-Server by MailRelay02 (envelope-from yaakov?s@rad.com) with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 May 2012 09:04:22 +0300
Received: from EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il ([192.114.24.28]) by EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il ([192.114.24.28]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Sun, 20 May 2012 09:25:53 +0300
From: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case
Thread-Topic: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case
Thread-Index: AQHNM2wjjUWCYSP1L0KRqAIgPef6jpbMSjoAgAABbICAAEcgbv//7bWAgAACcYCAAAajAIAFrxsg
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 06:25:52 +0000
Message-ID: <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC9043CDE8A@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il>
References: <562A61B995B24BD854A4D154@192.168.0.2> <m262bwchr9.wl%randy@psg.com> <08ab01cd3372$65934110$30b9c330$@olddog.co.uk> <tslaa18w21n.fsf@mit.edu> <4FB3E99D.1040606@stpeter.im> <CAHBDyN6SVUxKm4K1__zu47qNup-RF1L8exfb8n9n199y7fpGAQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1205161124380.47757@bxb-vpn3-744.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1205161124380.47757@bxb-vpn3-744.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.115.243.62]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Commtouch-Refid: str=0001.0A090204.4FB88E72.00C8,ss=1,fgs=0
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 06:26:01 -0000

> And of course if we had a slightly richer publication format we could 
> use, oh, say, underline, bold, italics and maybe even a special font 
> for normative terms, but I guess I am dreaming decades ahead...

I was waiting to see if someone was going to bring this up.

In Roman law, the way you capitalized something in a document could have significant consequences,
for example, incorrect use of Capitis Diminutio could change you from a free person into a slave!

OTOH, the Uniform Commercial Code requires certain terms be rendered "conspicuous",
which may be accomplished though capitalization, or using bold face, or a larger font, or contrasting color, etc.

The intervening 2000 years enabled the UCC to exploit more modern typesetting technologies.

But the IETF is still living in Roman times.

Y(J)S