Re: IETF Attendance by continent
Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Tue, 31 August 2010 13:55 UTC
Return-Path: <iljitsch@muada.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF583A69A9 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pu5G4G2nsl3Q for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:2:5::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538023A693F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:720:410:100f:223:32ff:fec4:ba94] ([IPv6:2001:720:410:100f:223:32ff:fec4:ba94]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id o7VDt3Ma057299 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:55:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Subject: Re: IETF Attendance by continent
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C7C3B30.3060908@gondrom.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:56:05 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FC4AE074-94CB-4FF0-A14B-7A85C743174B@muada.com>
References: <20100828160104.ABB016BE557@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <tslhbien28x.fsf@mit.edu> <FD26FDE7CD5040B3846E71047A4EB072@your029b8cecfe> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB177049A97D926EF@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <4C7C3B30.3060908@gondrom.org>
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:55:39 -0000
On 31 aug 2010, at 1:13, Tobias Gondrom wrote: > My vote is strongly in favor of 1:1:1. > 1. First, the location _is_ a significant barrier to entry for newcomers > and other contributors. Optimizing only for the current status quo does > create a strong perpetual cycle of self reinforcing structure of > contributors from the favored location(s). You assume that having a meeting on your home continent magically makes attending a meeting much easier. I don't think that's necessarily the case. Just consider the language issue. I think we can safely assume that everyone who thinks about attending IETF meetings speaks English. So attending a meeting in a country where English is the official language is much easier than in a place where few people speak it. Even in the Netherlands, where virtually everyone speaks at least some English, there was a bit of a language barrier because signs, menus, etc where often only available in Dutch. Also, flying across a big continent can take just as long as flying across an ocean. And although there is a correlation between travel distance and cost, that correlation is well below 1. Sometimes intercontinental flights are the same price or cheaper than regional flights, and often the difference is small enough that it disappears in the noise of hotel prices, ground transportation costs, food expenses and the like. Last but not least, attendance is only one metric. If it were the only relevant one, we'd have to meet on a Cisco campus once every three years, as about 10% of the attendees are employed by Cisco. Even though Asian attendance has been on the rise, contributions from Asian IETFers seem to be lagging their attendance numbers. (For instance, as far as I can tell from the names, none of the IESG members is from Asia.) For all these reasons, I think that 1:1:1 is not warrented at this time. Maybe it will be in a few more years, but I think we should first see how well meetings in places like Beijing go before committing to having a meeting in Asia every year. Meeting in Europe seems to lead to compromises. Maybe Asia will turn out to be better in this regard, maybe worse. I don't think we want to have meetings with more compromises just to appear balanced. > Consider that contributors > usually start as newcomers, attend several meetings, then write a draft, I don't know about you, but I wrote drafts before my first meeting. > join more WGs and maybe chair a WG. But if you make it hard for > newcomers to attend several meetings they are at a severe disadvantage > to become future contributors. If that were true we'd need to go to places where we _don't_ have attendees yet, not to Asia which has been sending a steady supply in recent years.
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? John R. Levine
- IETF Attendance by continent Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Stephen Farrell
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Noel Chiappa
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Fred Baker
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Marshall Eubanks
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Doug Ewell
- DPE and Nomcom [was Re: IETF Attendance by contin… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: DPE and Nomcom [was Re: IETF Attendance by co… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Donald Eastlake
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Lixia Zhang
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Fred Baker
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Tony Hansen
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Mark Nottingham
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Joel Jaeggli
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael Richardson
- RE: IETF Attendance by continent Glen Zorn
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Simon Josefsson
- RE: IETF Attendance by continent Elwell, John
- RE: IETF Attendance by continent Glen Zorn
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Marshall Eubanks
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Marshall Eubanks
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Joel Jaeggli
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Marshall Eubanks
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Andrew Sullivan
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Fred Baker
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Andrew Sullivan
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Ray Bellis
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent David Morris
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent David Kessens
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Jari Arkko
- RE: IETF Attendance by continent Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Fred Baker
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Marshall Eubanks
- Month- was Re: IETF Attendance by continent Janet P Gunn
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Scott Brim
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Spencer Dawkins
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Spencer Dawkins
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Andrew Sullivan
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Marshall Eubanks
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Joel Jaeggli
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Scott Brim
- RE: IETF Attendance by continent Ross Callon
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Peter Saint-Andre
- Res: IETF Attendance by continent Frederico Faria
- Res: Res: IETF Attendance by continent Frederico Faria
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS)
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Dave CROCKER
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Dave CROCKER
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Dave CROCKER
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Dave CROCKER
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Dave CROCKER
- Varying meeting venue -- why? Dave CROCKER
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Donald Eastlake
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Dave CROCKER
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Peter Saint-Andre
- RE: Varying meeting venue -- why? Ross Callon
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Scott Brim
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Fernando Gont
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Bob Hinden
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Mary Barnes
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Scott Brim
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Fernando Gont
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Mary Barnes
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Barry Leiba
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Ray Pelletier
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? t.petch
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Julian Reschke
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? John Levine
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Dave CROCKER
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Dave CROCKER
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Dave CROCKER
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Mary Barnes
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Scott Brim
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Dave CROCKER
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? John C Klensin
- Re: Varying meeting venue -- why? Dave CROCKER
- Re: Res: Res: IETF Attendance by continent SM
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Sam Hartman
- RE: Varying meeting venue -- why? Hadriel Kaplan
- RE: Varying meeting venue -- why? John R. Levine
- RE: Varying meeting venue -- why? Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Cullen Jennings
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Cullen Jennings
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Fred Baker
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Olaf Kolkman
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Dave CROCKER
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Dave CROCKER
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Noel Chiappa
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Sam Hartman
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Adrian Farrel
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent David Morris
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Scott Brim
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent David A. Bryan
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Dave CROCKER
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Randall Gellens
- RE: IETF Attendance by continent Ross Callon
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Robert Kisteleki
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Patrik Fältström
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Peter Saint-Andre
- Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by c… Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Patrik Fältström
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Melinda Shore
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Patrik Fältström
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Ross Callon
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Richard L. Barnes
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Randall Gellens
- RE: IETF Attendance by continent Noel Chiappa
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Tobias Gondrom
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Robin Uyeshiro
- Re: RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attenda… Scott W Brim
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … t.petch
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Dave CROCKER
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Donald Eastlake
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … John C Klensin
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Glen Zorn
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Randall Gellens
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Yoav Nir
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Clint Chaplin
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Glen Zorn
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Tobias Gondrom
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Marshall Eubanks
- RE: IETF Attendance by continent Ross Callon
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Marshall Eubanks
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Stephan Wenger
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Joel Jaeggli
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Doug Barton
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Michael StJohns
- RE: IETF Attendance by continent Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent Dave CROCKER
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Andrew G. Malis
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Christer Holmberg
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Yoav Nir
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Glen Zorn
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Christer Holmberg
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Christer Holmberg
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Glen Zorn
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Glen Zorn
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Christer Holmberg
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Xiangsong Cui
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Tim Bray
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Glen Zorn
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Fernando Gont
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Jelte Jansen
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Dave CROCKER
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Michael StJohns
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Michael Richardson
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Michael Richardson
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance … Dave CROCKER