Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 22 October 2013 06:47 UTC
Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C222311E849A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, MANGLED_FORM=2.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZW-8TZMb6QbP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5B411E8477 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (unknown [203.83.33.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B98D8A031 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 06:47:46 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 02:47:42 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
Message-ID: <20131022064340.GB7901@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <20131021125834.GA24167@nic.fr> <67E83EF109F9999F391CEC93@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20131021133746.GA29267@nic.fr> <673A097E66897B69B6C13B73@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20131022035640.GA7434@mx1.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131022035640.GA7434@mx1.yitter.info>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 06:47:53 -0000
I know, I know, responding to myself, but a follow-up conversation makes me think I should be a little more charitable. On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:56:41PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > He has just advocated "multiple roots" This turns out to be a consequence of his (quite correct) observation that, for a user, the full context isn't necessary. We already have this notion in the DNS -- that's what the search path function is for. M. Pouzin thinks this ought to be much more ubiquitous, in much the way that you don't have to dial the full phone path (or anyway, not everywhere) every time you call a local number. From this, he gets alternate roots. So he's not simply being a crank, though I don't fully understand how he gets to the conclusion he's reached. Now, having corrected my previous uncharitable description, I suggest that if people want to discuss DNSng, we do it on another list. Best, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral John C Klensin
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Noel Chiappa
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Dave Crocker
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Hannes Tschofenig
- Internet standardisation remains unilateral Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Jari Arkko
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Jelte Jansen
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Jorge Amodio
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Joe Abley
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral John Day
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral John Day
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Dave Crocker
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Lixia Zhang
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Dave Crocker
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Michel Py
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral John C Klensin
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Martin Vigoureux
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Måns Nilsson
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral John Day
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Michel Py
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Mark Nottingham
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral John Day
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral SM
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Jukka Ruohonen
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Roger Jørgensen
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral John Day
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Randy Presuhn
- RE: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Michel Py
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral John Day