IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Tue, 22 October 2013 00:27 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6273411E82B9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.481
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.118, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U3g5rrd7zkEq for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x229.google.com (mail-lb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4920911E80DE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id o14so1972914lbi.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=jGvchiaJ/VAfmHW4LGa4oy8WNUy3/vmpfTDm9Eg5DSU=; b=IfqWhRxA0q9RTeA68z+3ErGknhK3vSkk62WuxckbkHdSpvAXP8NBMuy/DnInDJRCKv i2SZAYV6MpFJY27pTOFOiE53j2Dy5bYm2dQ4HopIh/AWa/SxVt5fFAcYkSPX/82RbJJ0 08SqzEw2VkoFyyTvu0oAQqvsRaduLEJ4jsBRDNAUpOcP78Q5gMlb1HRugT6DwaoCRFDx Tvl8C484qu6vEsmPUwtrp+N6JQZ+Jxr8/HBb3X2R3U5t35lHEnO3t7HhrPdawnD3veGY mO82hT1VV5z757y9VOf+jaJP0Xwi7Z/WQqEMUpGbyi01dQfm5rbf+stZiawvNU+tdy/f yq4g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.172.137 with SMTP id bc9mr15190622lbc.21.1382401663280; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.148.165 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <526581A1.7010100@gmail.com>
References: <20131021125834.GA24167@nic.fr> <5265275B.8040105@dcrocker.net> <20131021133009.GA27979@nic.fr> <F633EFCE-3712-4608-8BAC-C46E322451F2@cs.ucla.edu> <526581A1.7010100@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:27:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwgZArgYEfT6-aR0ogW_PVk3uCc6YpnBvSUzebjoxvF_hA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2645613ac4f04e94978db"
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:27:53 -0000

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> More to the point, we did try the "submission via national standards
> bodies" approach. I believe it was called OSI.
>
>    Brian
>

Whether it worked is a matter of which metrics you judge it by.

They have a MUCH nicer HQ than we have. Ergo it worked in one regard
important to some people.

-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email