RE: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)

"WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> Thu, 01 July 2010 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F6B3A67DB; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.118
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.481, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3RVb7GX61Rhv; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 06:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5173A67B2; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 06:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,520,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="225866479"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2010 09:58:34 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,520,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="488016348"
Received: from unknown (HELO DC-US1HCEX3.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.52.22]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2010 09:58:34 -0400
Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([169.254.1.161]) by DC-US1HCEX3.global.avaya.com ([135.11.52.22]) with mapi; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:58:33 -0400
From: "WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
To: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>, James Rafferty <James.Rafferty@dialogic.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 09:56:27 -0400
Subject: RE: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
Thread-Topic: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
Thread-Index: AcsZHH0AtcZOei1LQOWpFprPhNCTwAACLYOJ
Message-ID: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FE98EE38@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
References: <4C29D2E4.5080203@ericsson.com> <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB85352642141019FA694@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE213FF2C25@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <4C2A2C19.1030906@cisco.com> <4C2AE94C.4020707@ericsson.com> <617DF0128820F9458AC39149A627EE6C01A66BC2A7@MBX.dialogic.com> <4C2B8ACE.3050301@cisco.com>, <AANLkTildtZowdEGDR9yegZWVXZjdoN13FoP8O-tXDrHN@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTildtZowdEGDR9yegZWVXZjdoN13FoP8O-tXDrHN@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, Roland Jesske <R.Jesske@telekom.de>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:58:24 -0000

________________________________________
From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Laura Liess [laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 8:53 AM

At least within the DT network, UUI is used between application
servers or application servers and "special" end devices as call
centers. As far as I know, UUI is currently not part of the DT normal
telephony package. Many years ago, it was, but people misused it.
_______________________________________________

Can you tell us about the misuse?  It might be relevant to the expected usage of the cuss feature.

Dale