IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> Fri, 09 July 2010 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2243A6A66; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.393
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.393 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.206, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1d-kn5pE3p9C; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76753A680F; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,564,1272844800"; d="scan'208";a="130482767"
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Jul 2010 14:59:36 +0000
Received: from [161.44.174.142] (dhcp-161-44-174-142.cisco.com [161.44.174.142]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o69Exas8018668; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:59:36 GMT
Message-ID: <4C373953.3000402@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:59:31 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
References: <4C29D2E4.5080203@ericsson.com> <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB85352642141019FA694@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE213FF2C25@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <4C2A2C19.1030906@cisco.com> <4C2AE94C.4020707@ericsson.com> <617DF0128820F9458AC39149A627EE6C01A66BC2A7@MBX.dialogic.com> <4C2B8ACE.3050301@cisco.com> <AANLkTildtZowdEGDR9yegZWVXZjdoN13FoP8O-tXDrHN@mail.gmail.com> <2A1051E9-99DC-458C-B96B-0BE7FB4CD4C1@cisco.com> <AANLkTik9DhnZcHO8qhOZo6Glj6rKFC0HDPbUpHTFtViN@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik9DhnZcHO8qhOZo6Glj6rKFC0HDPbUpHTFtViN@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 08:06:22 -0700
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, James Rafferty <James.Rafferty@dialogic.com>, Roland Jesske <R.Jesske@telekom.de>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:59:32 -0000

Laura Liess wrote:

> Is it so easy to instruct a proxy to
> inspect the body and eventually throw away a part of it? And should
> one do that?

While a proxy may inspect a body (if its not encrypted),
by definition a proxy may not modify or remove a body.

	Thanks,
	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email