Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
Gonzalo Camarillo <gcamaril@gmail.com> Wed, 14 July 2010 08:26 UTC
Return-Path: <gcamaril@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FAC3A6855; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ToXaf3kun3qS; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw5.ericsson.se (mailgw5.ericsson.se [193.180.251.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AE13A69CB; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb24-b7c56ae000001038-f8-4c3d7498ffa0
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw5.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 04.7B.04152.8947D3C4; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:26:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.174]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:26:00 +0200
Received: from [131.160.126.225] ([131.160.126.225]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:25:58 +0200
Message-ID: <4C3D7496.8020905@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:25:58 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <gcamaril@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
References: <4C28F980.3040702@ericsson.com> <AANLkTinf6-mtUKbdtw0p2j0xJQPBr4S-XCiimSNoKNdC@mail.gmail.com> <0010F1C2-2436-474D-BC1C-05AFC8A9E4C5@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0010F1C2-2436-474D-BC1C-05AFC8A9E4C5@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jul 2010 08:25:59.0633 (UTC) FILETIME=[3051DC10:01CB232E]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:14:52 -0700
Cc: DISPATCH list <dispatch@ietf.org>, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:26:34 -0000
Hi, thanks for your comments on the charter proposal. Per the comments received, we will modify bullet 5 as follows so that it is clearer: OLD: 5. SIP elements may need to apply policy about passing and screening the information. NEW: 5. SIP elements may need to apply policy about passing and filtering UUI. The included application, encoding, semantics, and content information will allow endpoint or intermediary SIP elements to allow or block UUI based on the type and originator, not based on the actual UUI data, which may be end-to-end encrypted by the application. Further discussions on this topic should happen on the mailing list of this WG. Cheers, Gonzalo
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) Cullen Jennings
- RE: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) Elwell, John
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) Laura Liess
- RE: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control U… Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) Cullen Jennings
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control U… Laura Liess
- RE: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control U… WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control U… Laura Liess
- RE: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control U… James Rafferty
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control U… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control U… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) Alan Johnston
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) Laura Liess
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control U… Cullen Jennings
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) Cullen Jennings
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control U… Laura Liess
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control U… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) Cullen Jennings
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) Gonzalo Camarillo
- RE: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS)
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) Cullen Jennings
- RE: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
- RE: [dispatch] WG Review: Call Control UUI for SI… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)