Re: future of identifiers

Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org> Fri, 01 November 2013 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rwfranks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231BD11E813D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oKglWkebpMm6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x231.google.com (mail-ie0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FD611E811D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id e14so8151144iej.36 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=GvnakQ7nWeh5qpUmQjUcTs9m9j40bAd3dgW5WnfTjbc=; b=0PLKYrKpOCtYfjvZUlGjRoQILtiUifO/9jSWEO6tQrE0+1JcWpT9qeFRa/f+FmxhiV utKKiuFgJplFLJbYWi4iwfl+5oEWBAdlz8p9geDi1TgBA1BHBgwgpPE9K6Osu6MSjnSY WvmAzHdVa4KJ4cZIqvW3l4RZINd0PhI8EcD7XpZbTCkvPxR1iK1nfzhVLO5ZfH0ZqO4g llonfwgy5O5pflmltXlkk3K3EzDP8LGNP3UODgxkSO6mmGu68BI93Df7lb00tBl8h1F0 syD8dtJ1Q3PuK2hKpB6BJ8yNyNpmG/4wShYIEOh69ZGXVBzvYN/wXjr/E/pWH4tA58DL rutQ==
X-Received: by 10.42.84.9 with SMTP id j9mr1965859icl.57.1383332809893; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rwfranks@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.17.98 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwih=PFukkapNZgJCz-uSkaF4sk=oj20KpFtUTNzQL8dDA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9F02AA5D-4146-4F8D-B635-DE5B44A9DA9A@piuha.net> <CAMm+Lwih=PFukkapNZgJCz-uSkaF4sk=oj20KpFtUTNzQL8dDA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:06:29 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: aN-M_ODlMX7SmWltkgjaHvLZYpc
Message-ID: <CAKW6Ri6mGwO8FnGjC5bNSAGUMcD1+DuQ90XZbRMzvZ57OV-FRA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: future of identifiers
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="90e6ba614d48bd6dcd04ea2244cd"
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:06:53 -0000

On 30 October 2013 03:44, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:

> Lets fix email addresses.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hallambaker-prismproof-key-00
>
>
If Alice and Bob were intent on keeping their long-running secret affair
from the attention of all-seeing NSA traffic analysis, they would need to
encrypt or otherwise obfuscate their email addresses on a per-message
basis. Advertising a public key in LinkedIn or the pages of cryptography
text books does not achieve much.


Dick Franks
________________________