Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy

"Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> Thu, 16 January 2020 04:55 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18D6120899; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:55:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CgKs08P-1fdS; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6376120807; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.180.150.2] (helo=mail.rg.net) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1irxBW-000OkX-Fo; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 04:55:10 +0000
Received: from c-24-16-172-3.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([24.16.172.3] helo=[192.168.0.157]) by mail.rg.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1irxBV-00055r-Ds; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 04:55:09 +0000
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:55:06 -0800
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <343C5DC4-9B53-4E6A-BB17-1578E601B94C@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <751BE0CC-99C6-442C-843E-97BE053D0B43@akamai.com>
References: <4e888f0a-a1e8-df72-cbbc-9a2e2f0d0d05@iab.org> <20200115221637.GA32014@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAOj+MMFaXnWs1Au6HWZ_CMFt4oyYUExPt2C_r9VnStRaUgf_ng@mail.gmail.com> <b6525973-32dd-1ac2-d354-d39aa916082b@gmail.com> <m21rs0qay4.wl-randy@psg.com> <751BE0CC-99C6-442C-843E-97BE053D0B43@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QGRUYhNSLkstqm1cqDt8tviOwJY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 04:55:13 -0000

>> i know this is terribly old fashioned and silly of me.  but some see 
>> roles as public service for the good of the internet.  and some
>> of us are spoiled brats whose employers support them willy nilly.
> Yes, but that tends to perpetuate the situation that only bigger 
> organizations can afford to sponsor most of the IETF leadership 
> positions. Many (probably including Randy and Brian) see that as a 
> problem.

neither of my two full time jobs are for large corps.  one is an isp
research lab, and the other a startup routing stack dev.

randy