IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 06 April 2021 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22873A296A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7YT81iPx-QZu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 231CC3A2968 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Zephyrus.local (76-218-40-253.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [76.218.40.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 136HEKAL070302 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:14:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1617729261; bh=HXouxVdhuYFk47+jkxpgFcdcz/jwskGcvwzydN8bBB0=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=LMmajaaJzzxh7UJ1Nsck/ayJXoLpZcvYJbQakoaKueXyjs382AHFQ9TTQR0Rq+nyn OE3m3cqjNcnz64U8ehLC6sZBjPn0qCPTHQDmXTEbcnzRVAMj7pMJ3R6sqGreG8fHvN lwsZt5YfTYtyKanrUSPpYPFywDMkFLvoEI1ka+vg=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 76-218-40-253.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [76.218.40.253] claimed to be Zephyrus.local
Subject: Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <e8155935-e85d-6f36-4b0e-e311ff1a181a@ietf.org> <d3e27fcc-2851-b14e-d991-50818ff23d43@ietf.org> <6ddb6f92-0cb1-5118-1f4c-7dc86d68359a@network-heretics.com> <4a88da8c-eddc-d00c-79ef-fe537702f1d7@nostrum.com> <b9011e76-4bec-5e21-0b41-5eb1fe80840f@network-heretics.com> <b544867a-1643-efad-bfc3-e28240e41b7d@nostrum.com> <0425ff6c-7794-0160-ecb8-3df84f2cf766@network-heretics.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <236bdd09-3f7c-3984-1961-4b0b11d8a2f1@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 12:14:14 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0425ff6c-7794-0160-ecb8-3df84f2cf766@network-heretics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Qku0-22-SvfKXxcDLUhq-Sw0Hus>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 17:14:28 -0000

On 4/6/21 12:10, Keith Moore wrote:
>
> Ok, I didn't think I was asking you to do anything that contradicted 
> RFC 3005 and I understand that any change to the actual language 
> requires IETF Consensus.   I do think, however, that since the 
> document you referred to [1]
>
>

I did? Where? The only thing I cited was a literal excerpt of RFC 3005.

/a


> [1] https://github.com/ietf/saa/blob/master/unprofessional-commentary.md
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email