Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 06 April 2021 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB9C3A29C9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ITWkPy7XHWsF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBE683A29CA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A955C00C3; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 13:25:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 06 Apr 2021 13:25:16 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=48LU4P1ZFpTT1r9DxoiCjoDUHDrUVBDpu3D34QsQp P4=; b=cp15pRRmF9mxTciERvpQ+JNE9UXemUc1I4/qCUCcKIXReF3Bm5hHjs53+ WEe5xdPDaCn5/8WZSrHAICgBLgn9mw4rGltgXYduoe4jiK2J6S/8eS9pwbLjQSW5 cPeVB3NIeimkR1+I51svY3OxZeWa0icBJe6kmh8R3vVcpNhskp7A5S1vDQjU4Vh5 RbiZJG32q+9DgdKofuE9ziHkKwH7dInr2tcAhxYSId9tjcEdDnjiUZO3V/DfoPT2 wvoE9ekMCldQDOWki4QiNJoPZ+0RAl1KhBwdJCA5Y+KnrXmGp1ijfN8mGl1FyKD/ DxxONVJt77r2YsBR/rvqaBv05PhPw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:e5lsYCMTvWg3kIrv-0aCUun-G6G2DQaAgwMJmEZCE80Z2PbXipiubA> <xme:e5lsYA-07L0VucAZnsw933nUF4KBFWSypDyDtYH80W-92JfMFOybhJ4jUEmefp3NH fG-gDViq82d8Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudejhedgheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihht hhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephefhuedtheefgfefgffhkeehgfeugfeiudeugeejkeef leelueeiffetfeeuudeunecukfhppeejfedruddufedrudeiledriedunecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:e5lsYJR8wn6kV3YrDG6Z9Pxd6b6-ECqwAKHcOKiWUPUevrVRYvj_6w> <xmx:e5lsYCtvDyoOwiEQzrtYP6HgHC2-HetFCvYVid8a36LFirAypS_VTQ> <xmx:e5lsYKe7Wsg0M1FJcLjmwPDjeqlhWaXIzD4NUQlGr8v3ZWBvksui3Q> <xmx:fJlsYEqfofxxlizhUETtyZuGs8PASaW5pRSs7JmLyW90WBg1IeWVwg>
Received: from [192.168.30.202] (c-73-113-169-61.hsd1.tn.comcast.net [73.113.169.61]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 658A224005C; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 13:25:15 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <e8155935-e85d-6f36-4b0e-e311ff1a181a@ietf.org> <d3e27fcc-2851-b14e-d991-50818ff23d43@ietf.org> <6ddb6f92-0cb1-5118-1f4c-7dc86d68359a@network-heretics.com> <4a88da8c-eddc-d00c-79ef-fe537702f1d7@nostrum.com> <b9011e76-4bec-5e21-0b41-5eb1fe80840f@network-heretics.com> <b544867a-1643-efad-bfc3-e28240e41b7d@nostrum.com> <0425ff6c-7794-0160-ecb8-3df84f2cf766@network-heretics.com> <236bdd09-3f7c-3984-1961-4b0b11d8a2f1@nostrum.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <451de116-9970-e6f6-0fcc-3f54f49a4fc7@network-heretics.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 13:25:14 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <236bdd09-3f7c-3984-1961-4b0b11d8a2f1@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/h5d6OgxF3LrC6Xt8-78a2KwPYvU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 17:25:23 -0000

On 4/6/21 1:14 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> On 4/6/21 12:10, Keith Moore wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I didn't think I was asking you to do anything that contradicted 
>> RFC 3005 and I understand that any change to the actual language 
>> requires IETF Consensus.   I do think, however, that since the 
>> document you referred to [1]
>>
>>
>
> I did? Where? The only thing I cited was a literal excerpt of RFC 3005.
>
Oh, sorry.   I was citing a document referenced in a message by Dhruv 
Dhody posting as saa@ietf.org.   Sorry for the mis-attribution.

Keith