IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: slot attributes & last call

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 18 December 2014 00:47 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6970F1A00CD; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:47:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dDyayiK8OTI3; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:47:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37101A008C; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:47:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4583768059; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:47:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=H1NffEFpztAdQD KCOlrz/MX2Hso=; b=dHHU1yV4Wba0nvmKAoIxwRA3HxSTW+PvNgM69qlImL2tiU DlcHHLiREhqMj+45U81O5uTNqpJBVPBtH7mU9VgkBsLDABTkrso4cKH0/YtRp3Bb g+cNidqj0RUeLTrfBkCI1gBuf5Xe/+3fJ5DwuqKbDJPEyYRo4Er67jMYGjQ9E=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3244F768057; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:47:23 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 18:47:22 -0600
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Jaroslav Imrich <jaroslav.imrich@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: slot attributes & last call
Message-ID: <20141218004717.GN9443@localhost>
References: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1412161359100.4549@keflavik> <CAB6OCMvGxT99cGGBSBbz=XU2+F1xRzBa97z6dY-qPSJk1GWXyQ@mail.gmail.com> <20141217230150.GB9443@localhost> <CAB6OCMvkPSfNYqftAgbcN5KrG7kxb5ooico205O6EffcsU8SwQ@mail.gmail.com> <20141218000736.GL9443@localhost> <alpine.GSO.2.00.1412171614240.4549@keflavik> <CAB6OCMsAdTarz5XBHgTnU=v9qweS5B6mk-tb7Gbf7kwkDFBDMg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAB6OCMsAdTarz5XBHgTnU=v9qweS5B6mk-tb7Gbf7kwkDFBDMg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/TKJsf9KrSb61ouTFNx208NFG5Fs
Cc: Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat@oracle.com>, Stef Walter <stef@thewalter.net>, ietf@ietf.org, saag@ietf.org, Jan Pechanec <jan.pechanec@oracle.com>, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <n.mavrogiannopoulos@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:47:25 -0000

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:23:02AM +0100, Jaroslav Imrich wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Jan Pechanec <jan.pechanec@oracle.com>
> wrote:
> > >I think so.  This is really for Jan to answer.  Maybe the Solaris
> > >libpkcs11 should just ensure a meaningful (stable and distinct) slot
> > >label.  If that could be done then slot-id could be excluded here.
> > >
> > >Jan?
> >
> >         for example, metaslot on Solaris is always 0 so slot-id=0
> > would be reliable there to use to access the soft token.  Jan.
> 
> And there is no other URI that could identify that slot without the slot-id
> attribute? i.e. pkcs11:slot-description=metaslot

I would think so.  Maybe Jan misunderstood my question; he certainly
didn't answer it.

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email