IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 13 November 2008 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40C228C105; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:43:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB1F28C150 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:43:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.066
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.066 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.266, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0oP4IcPR7T31 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:43:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AB828C105 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:43:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from subman.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mADFgiSG002626 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:43:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1226590985; x=1226677385; bh=wl2vuw1UMg15ptJY4o715uT6VbY2TvL7dY0UEynFJpU=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=Zp7w8A3x1J4F8FeCjhD4QV0UQ7M0djNy2JdBNckMRQG9E/ZcsnglNYY3AxCKhdfOt xy18u+Mmm4VyU9sQporTyvR1VecpeZZEG2zzyaqnPi8VrHQ78EXkyv1vAemhi44zcW fgAv9CS9yM+zqSQHIEX1djncosmPvS3+6xSL+cCE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=ly7Bo9469DbPOGPCcsp29j5L8xy8bkCptjNkLoTLTayeptlnKzmiedeB77gNtB9uJ sn04Euwv9jA6tLsmvk6m1lXE2gsf0abg0jnsN4Bp5vbqLzuvf0S3osh+eaA97Pf6kJh WDcSYFc1MdPIiMeq0KOOI44cStsBwHEOHlAOy38=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20081113014508.028f3758@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:41:07 -0800
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP
In-Reply-To: <20081110162001.BFE403A683E@core3.amsl.com>
References: <20081021150200.5A1833A6B44@core3.amsl.com> <917F6DFA1F45621CB238A4FA@[172.16.0.21]> <20081110162001.BFE403A683E@core3.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

At 08:19 10-11-2008, Russ Housley wrote:
>To make them all parallel in structure, the first numbered item in 
>section 3 becomes: "1. The IESG finds no conflict between this 
>document and IETF work."
>
>In RFC 3932, these numbered items (except the first one, which is 
>the same until the modification above) begin "The IESG 
>thinks"  During pre-Last-Call-review, I received feedback that "The 
>IESG finds" was a better.  Now, you propose "The IESG 
>believes".    I do believe that the current wording is better than 
>the original.  I'm willing to change it to something else if there 
>is consensus to do so.  What do other reviewers find/think/believe/prefer?

In a different message, John mentioned ""has concluded".  That sounds 
better as the numbered items are about conclusions reached.  My 
second preference would be "The IESG believes".

Regards,
-sm 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email