IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Wed, 05 December 2018 12:31 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD3F130DF4; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 04:31:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wDg_RZog1XsO; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 04:31:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C60CB128BCC; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 04:31:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=6ZSvvSfPnOhWrsFl8flMyNtMlH7XUPUNKdP1ne5Ts9g=; b=Kpdme9GKRANcrCvBmyf72tN0m PYVTKcezFaovBWCwfUvm8sdL33yADWCzPjztGrUcJj8WJX84dhDLkN6GyRgVzoMbifDXr6rrH2ie2 9c9XKGSbGWiADaOO1lcgZ8yS+GOT0S6GcJ/vHmmGNpwWRe2zIf9b8F03/A9ycGRl7cCB2Dc+9+ehb LmBrzhiyBakiBUQ3IGzy0DcQUSWv+4F3Ni1sUdejryfUyit8Wtc+EfwXeQtCE0GT0lGaGsCOHpo8+ VhRQyS+x8KdZ4yYJTOEJK1OthUTptKO7A7VZZb1g480IbNMAqnsw9ASbLBMzXkL15R2KofGg7YSHf bDUZOttgQ==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-240-132.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.240.132]:57125 helo=[192.168.1.16]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1gUWKk-002yGV-9L; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 07:31:19 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (16B92)
In-Reply-To: <20181205122142.GJ1543@Space.Net>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 04:31:17 -0800
Cc: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering.all@ietf.org, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, opsec@ietf.org, tsv-art@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F17C4944-09EC-4AAC-84A0-B660E36AAE89@strayalpha.com>
References: <8d3d3b05-ecc3-ad54-cb86-ffe6dc4b4f16@gmail.com> <C929A8B9-D65C-4EF7-9707-2238AE389BE3@strayalpha.com> <CAL9jLaY4h75KK4Bh-kZC6-5fJupaNdUfm1gK2Dg99jBntMCEyQ@mail.gmail.com> <C47149DC-CAF2-449F-8E18-A0572BBF4746@strayalpha.com> <CAL9jLaYfysKm7qrG=+jq7zV=5ODnSX-tAhBAiTU7SzYF-YmcGw@mail.gmail.com> <728C6048-896E-4B12-B80B-2091D7373D16@strayalpha.com> <CAL9jLaYHVdHr+rVoWeNtXTXgLxbTaX8V9gn3424tvsLW60Kvow@mail.gmail.com> <5E70C208-0B31-4333-BB8C-4D45E678E878@isc.org> <CAN-Dau0go6_Puf0A9e7KBpk0ApJBUvcxYtezxnwNc-8pKJ3PwQ@mail.gmail.com> <4D69FA8E-FB8A-4A16-9CA6-690D8AE33C9E@strayalpha.com> <20181205122142.GJ1543@Space.Net>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VtK6OWR19E7iu4SxQNCSyrTrsN0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 12:31:21 -0000


> On Dec 5, 2018, at 4:21 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 04:13:47AM -0800, Joe Touch wrote:
>> Then THAT is the security issue.  Not the packets that cause a broken implementation to have problems.
> 
> Can we declare folks at IETF that have no idea about operational realities
> to be a security issue?

As long as we can do the same for operators that blame protocols for vendor issues.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email