Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area

Adam Roach <adam@estacado.net> Mon, 26 September 2005 11:30 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EJrC5-0004qk-R0; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:30:49 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EIvkw-0008GN-Oy for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 18:10:59 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA18048 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 18:10:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from magus.nostrum.com ([69.5.195.2] helo=nostrum.com ident=root) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIvrQ-0004tD-Lx for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 18:17:43 -0400
Received: from [192.168.2.164] (static-68-236-123-187.bos.east.verizon.net [68.236.123.187]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8NMAGqB019886 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:10:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@estacado.net)
Message-ID: <43347D67.3000702@estacado.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:10:47 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@estacado.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-6 (X11/20050513)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <BF581557.AA8%mshore@cisco.com> <433475BD.1040605@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <433475BD.1040605@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 68.236.123.187 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:30:47 -0400
Cc: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>, IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Dave Crocker wrote:

> (This area is going to take over xmpp, too?)


I don't think it is a useful exercise to go through all the closed 
working groups to determine which would have been in RAI had the area 
existed when they were still active.

/a

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf