IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Fri, 23 September 2005 23:03 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EIwZJ-000391-BE; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:03:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EIwZH-00038w-1h for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:02:59 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA21236 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:02:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIwfm-00063I-N8 for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:09:44 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (adsl-71-131-47-236.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [71.131.47.236]) (authenticated bits=0) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8NN3RLT023982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:03:28 -0700
Message-ID: <43348992.5070804@bbiw.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:02:42 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4 (Windows/20050908)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Roach <adam@estacado.net>
References: <BF581557.AA8%mshore@cisco.com> <433475BD.1040605@dcrocker.net> <43347D67.3000702@estacado.net>
In-Reply-To: <43347D67.3000702@estacado.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird: Found to be clean
X-Songbird-From: dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org


Adam Roach wrote:
> Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
>> (This area is going to take over xmpp, too?)
> 
> 
> I don't think it is a useful exercise to go through all the closed 
> working groups to determine which would have been in RAI had the area 
> existed when they were still active.

i agree.  so it's probably a good thing I didn't.

by the same token it does not make sense to include work that seems to have no 
relationship to the various (and varying) stated technical criteria.

Therefore, mentioned parallel work -- whether active or completed -- by way of 
demonstrating an implication, did, and does, seem useful.

d/

-- 

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email