Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups
Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Tue, 10 February 2026 18:28 UTC
Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E100DB4DBA03 for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 10:28:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.821
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.821 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.624, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hbFjmE9Fioc3 for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 10:28:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [46.182.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B2C9B4DB9F9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 10:28:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crumpet.local (unknown [89.101.70.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.netability.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BB109CE86; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 18:28:22 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
References: <7b702e8f-d2be-5b08-e262-33fbed538f98@foobar.org> <460BCE12-4C45-45D0-94C8-83B8E2D45049@gmail.com> <922b6d08-1cb5-4791-974f-ff17850de25f@gmail.com> <5DCE2993-39C8-4FAC-AD91-7B8E504E996C@gmail.com> <20260208015537.8D945F5944ED@ary.qy> <cd492277-0bca-4219-a3ad-eb75ccd2ebe7@gmail.com> <m27bsk6d9c.fsf@ja.int.chopps.org> <d5bccc8e-f013-c3e5-09cc-30913983b2f0@foobar.org> <b94b3e13-ebc9-4fb1-932f-89b05c2ce3ec@joelhalpern.com> <28670ac9-159c-4830-afe7-c5df4ce354da@htt-consult.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <1effade0-b312-cb31-ac3e-d6201e16ed87@foobar.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 18:28:20 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 26.2; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <28670ac9-159c-4830-afe7-c5df4ce354da@htt-consult.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------120432E3EC66E8C1188C07A9"
Content-Language: en-US
Message-ID-Hash: VEKBT7ZI3ATHSGGX5F2LHVNJ5VLWNIEY
X-Message-ID-Hash: VEKBT7ZI3ATHSGGX5F2LHVNJ5VLWNIEY
X-MailFrom: nick@foobar.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/X0BaTiSZGu_NLdTeSEF2PlAdF1Y>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>
Robert Moskowitz wrote on 10/02/2026 16:20: > He won. He penetrated every system and technology and did it faster > than anyone else. And there were two really experienced industry > attack teams there. for a pen-test, you only need to succeed once. If you execute 10 things which are obviously wrong, it doesn't matter a whole lot. If you're writing a protocol specification, or contributing to a discussion on an ietf WG and if you have a hit rate of 10%, it matters a lot. Nick
- AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Nick Hilliard
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Loganaden Velvindron
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Colin Perkins
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Bob Hinden
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups John Levine
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups John Levine
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Orie
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Kathleen Moriarty
- RE: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Cheng Li
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups George Michaelson
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups George Michaelson
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Christian Hopps
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Nick Hilliard
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Joel Halpern
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Job Snijders
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Robert Moskowitz
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Nick Hilliard
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Robert Moskowitz
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Jeffrey Walton
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Robert Moskowitz
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Rich Kulawiec
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups George Michaelson
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Carsten Bormann
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… John Levine
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… John R Levine
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Arturo Servin
- AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" to IE… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Michael Richardson
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Laurence Lundblade
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Michael Richardson
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Donald Eastlake
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… John R Levine
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Lixia Zhang
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Christian Huitema
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Tal Mizrahi
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… John R Levine
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… John R Levine
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Rob Sayre
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Jeffrey Walton
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Lixia Zhang
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Michael Richardson
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… John Levine
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Jeffrey Walton
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… lloyd.wood
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Lloyd W
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Lixia Zhang
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Michael Richardson
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Joel Halpern
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Nick Hilliard
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Christian Huitema
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… George Michaelson
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Toerless Eckert
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Lixia Zhang
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Elmar K. Bins
- Human SI - Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF wo… Toerless Eckert
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Toerless Eckert
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Christian Huitema
- Re: AI slop "contributions" to IETF working groups Michael Richardson
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Toerless Eckert
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… George Michaelson
- Re: AI disclosure [was: AI slop "contributions" t… Martin J. Dürst