Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-03.txt> (IETF Guidelines for Conduct) to Best Current Practice

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Fri, 08 November 2013 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E609F21E8138 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:44:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.824
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.824 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.153, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S7AOPmr6x+hy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:44:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-x229.google.com (mail-oa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D9521E8109 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:44:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id g12so1097218oah.28 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:43:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=b1J7A5pVJabohx3Seec4CkOTaDnISK6aR/UJeL0ET5c=; b=SfkyugB/w5gHYGB62k96NK2nQhtMb9HeEbz1lpg5R470FxQfz9wqCHKphRymcxgB1z d+xy/hVi7BR5+Yt66y1P7jCG/Vvb1Mppao/v2GEKbopJgJM0TquROnx2pr4tYetFrLhf pa6rY3uJoomGeDyt/6JIQmdRAmb0mE0/z6EDk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b1J7A5pVJabohx3Seec4CkOTaDnISK6aR/UJeL0ET5c=; b=gdO5Ntj9YRUnV0vX4SafMZzXmig1tvUE5WCXYd9cJdgM1jnMsacJ9LqjfnksCrgJxw oXJ1ZRiLdnWgsD04stG6SKGLI2cvUVBeEK0z00mix9yJAsEQtVPHyT8YVaos7mUMj060 D3JaQpOx852XCTytkcdJn491cVeIxp/qb5trjw6NyvZgfQ/nnX20x24DvgVLQCgbiXjU yCl5jWOmhBMDoxyDWMAVIFjTeu7XlbJc8cuoDnlWuf/jSjMWfqPc8h6sgbJi0zZJwvvk 9jT6xoQgdufGhyGfJZJN4niYtYu1lT3ll3ErRogB0+7VYR495w4hsC11F2DrEkehIXno /Fzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkwDFRJPnPvFS9L6eJxUDWrYldVLc4g0o2We90muPWXy/kZX5yUuQZ0rvTUBONYqUzJlFv0
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.213.39 with SMTP id np7mr77966obc.92.1383932639546; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:43:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.121.97 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:43:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20131105224144.0ca69c28@resistor.net>
References: <20131103150309.1554.26103.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20131105224144.0ca69c28@resistor.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:43:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzxyi_+SxQnpVdh-uN6sUr_OOrrB0XRV4up=MsurE6LJTA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-03.txt> (IETF Guidelines for Conduct) to Best Current Practice
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2f5465faada04eaadedff"
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:44:01 -0000

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:13 AM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> At 07:03 03-11-2013, The IESG wrote:
>
>> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
>> the following document:
>> - 'IETF Guidelines for Conduct'
>>   <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-03.txt> as Best Current Practice
>>
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-12-01. Exceptionally, comments may be
>>
>
SM,

I'm in favour of the publication of this draft, as-is, with or without the
changes discussed on this list.

Small formatting glitch on points 3 and 4 of §2 - the intentation seems
awry.

One small note is that it took me a while to figure out the SQPA reference
- I'd assumed that indented paragraph was a direct quote from the talk or
the slides, whereas it's actually the "Simple Question; Polite Answer"
concept you're referring to. It might be useful to expand that acronym.

Dave.